Yeah, I operate on this assumption entirely. I’m pretty sure there was a book published about this idea in the 80s and it was widely read among political leadership.
courageousstep
I….did not realize they were NOT classified as wildlife. Of course they’re wildlife. You can certainly pen up elk and make profit off of them, but that doesn’t mean they’re the same as cows or chickens.
Edit: also, like, they’re native to this land as wildlife, while cows and other domestics were imported??
I didn’t realize that Coors, the beer, funded the start of the Heritage Foundation.
The beer is shit, but now I know that the entire company is also shit.
I think that it’s similar to the idea that anti-racism needs to start with white people.
White people have the social capital to stay safe while protesting—thus able to further the cause for longer—and the subjugation starts with white people so they have a responsibility to start the movement.
Rich people have the economic capital to stay safe while protesting—thus able to further the cause for longer—and the subjugation originates with rich people so they have a responsibility to start the movement.
I just want to shake conservatives and ask “Why doesn’t your government want you to know things??”
That’s a GOVERNMENT webpage??? What the fuck??
Oh, that’s super fun. I didn’t have poisonous rice on my End of the World bingo card.
This is why we need feminist activism: prevent men from chaining a woman’s ability to pay for food or housing to his access of her reproductive system (in the form of sex or literally reproducing).
Too bad conservative women don’t recognize that.
Fuck. I hate that you’re absolutely right.
Where can I find the evidence for this? I want to read more about it.
Why is a victim’s statement being posted on Twitter by the government? Why is the government using Twitter like it’s a legitimate platform?