credo

joined 8 months ago
[–] credo@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago

Hey, you guys showed up on “the front page” again. Real sorry about that.

But, hey. IMO, lemmy is anarchism. So there you have it.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago

So DOGE is getting cut then?

[–] credo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, don’t set any data centers on fire.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (5 children)

That’s too many positions to research for just one race. Five to six would probably be about the right amount of candidates for a single seat RCV.

I think [open] primaries still have a place to help weed out the field and narrow in on specific candidates.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago (4 children)

It’s too complicated to say “a surplus”.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

I’m guessing it was prioritized by the amount of evidence, and the chances of getting a conviction.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago

I mean, I wouldn’t want to get attacked by a conspiracy theorist (that sounds wrong) either.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Maybe fix the structure - the whole voting system - rather than just putting more of the same into the never ending circle jerk?

Democrats had their chance to make reforms and ignored it. Both parties oppose election reform because it threatens their [current] control.

The people are to blame.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You watch too much propaganda.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

It’s because they were probably educated in the US.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Also, don’t say, “I wasn’t aware it was so important to you.” That’s definitely a trigger phrase.

Try, “Thank you for letting me know this is important for you,” (or “how you feel”) instead.

 

For the first time since 538 published our presidential election forecast for Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump, Trump has taken the lead (if a very small one) over Harris. As of 3 p.m. Eastern on Oct. 18, our model gives Trump a 52-in-100 chance of winning the majority of Electoral College votes. The model gives Harris a 48-in-100 chance.

 

It’s kinda how you read the name, innit?

view more: next ›