crypto

joined 1 year ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
What's the biggest change you would like to see in computing/tech? in c/programming@programming.dev
[–] crypto@toot.syfershock.com 1 points 11 months ago

@onlinepersona +1
prima donnas like Stewey on In Living Color: "Look what I kandoo!"

What's the biggest change you would like to see in computing/tech? in c/programming@programming.dev
What's the biggest change you would like to see in computing/tech? in c/programming@programming.dev
Firefox Is Going To Try And Ship With Wayland Enabled By Default in c/linux@lemmy.ml
Firefox Is Going To Try And Ship With Wayland Enabled By Default in c/linux@lemmy.ml
A response to the "Boycott Wayland" article in c/linux@lemmy.ml
[–] crypto@toot.syfershock.com -3 points 11 months ago

@theshatterstone54 @buzz The rumors are real. I've tested Wayland on several distros on several machines and it has always been a disaster. On Debian Bookworm KDE on a FRESH install, the first thing I did was open the Discover app and it crashed. Every time I opened it the compositor took a dump.

Wayland is garbage and its apologists have an agenda. Their agenda does not include working software.

Firefox Is Going To Try And Ship With Wayland Enabled By Default in c/linux@lemmy.ml
A response to the "Boycott Wayland" article in c/linux@lemmy.ml
[–] crypto@toot.syfershock.com -3 points 11 months ago

@theshatterstone54 > "Reason for that being that Wayland is built with Linux in mind and would not work under FreeBSD without a lot of effort bwing put in as it uses some Linux-specific components or libraries."

Not so. FreeBSD is 100% Linux compatible and has Linux Kernel emulation built in. Wayland support is also built in to FreeBSD. FreeBSD is a much superior operating system compared to Linux. But the FreeBSD team only cares about the server aspects and really does not care about a graphical desktop. They tend to use Macs.

FreeBSD Documentation Portal

The state of Linux Desktop interface is a schizophrenic flustercuck with far too many cooks spoiling the stew. They're not just spoiling the stew; they're pooping in it. And a bunch of noveu-riche trust-fund baby nerds think this is cool. They don't give a rat's ass about the end user being able to get work done. They would rather we all waste our time filing bug reports rather than getting things done.

9/11 families call out TikTok over Osama bin Laden trend in c/technology@lemmy.world
Firefox Is Going To Try And Ship With Wayland Enabled By Default in c/linux@lemmy.ml
Nikki Haley vows to abolish anonymous social media accounts: 'It's a national security threat' in c/technology@lemmy.world
[–] crypto@toot.syfershock.com 7 points 1 year ago

@L4s This dumb broad would need to ban the Federalist Papers, too, since they were anonymous.

McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission ~>

"Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority [.....] It thus exemplifies the purpose behind the Bill of Rights and of the First Amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation [.....] at the hand of an intolerant society."

www.eff.org/issues/anonymity

Tricky Nikki said:

"Every person on social media should be verified by their name. It’s a national security threat," she said. "When you do that, all of a sudden people have to stand by what they say and it gets rid of the Russian bots, the Iranian bots and the Chinese bots."

Her handlers just want to control all narratives. She doesn't care about Russian bots. Nikki Haley is a bot.