curbstickle

That's... Insane feedback.

But sure.

Your first sentence was about physical switches...

There already is a logical separation that makes perfect sense - out through VPN with no network access initiated by that VLAN to the other two internal. That'd a security step that's pretty clear and valid off the bat.

So again - I don't follow anything of what you're driving at, no. Because from the first sentence in your first comment forward isn't making any sense.

Please, clarify, because I don't know why you'd even bring up different switches for an extremely basic logical separation.

You dont need to have the same subnet on different vlans. You also dont need them to each have a router, that isn't how this works.

Each VLAN gets a gateway, in a subnet accessible within that VLAN.

Under no circumstances do you need a separate physical router for having 2 VLANs on the same network. That's not how VLANs work.

Doing all of this on a router doesn't make sense without a physical separation though

I'm going to have to say, I have zero idea why you would suggest this for something that is logical, and specifically not physical.

Logical separations and vlan segregation for trust models is standard practice (though hopefully more will trend towards a zero trust model, but irrelevant here). There is zero need for any physical separation. What are you talking about?

Not OP, but logical separation and firewall rules is a needed first step for security. They already mentioned in the post that one vlan has dedicated outbound (via VPN only) and doesn't have access to their .200.

Physical switches per vlan is completely unnecessary, and entirely why vlans are used rather than subnets.

HP/Lenovo/Dell workstation tiny/mini/micro will be cheaper and better supported. Price-wise, I've set up 4-5 reasonably powerful t/m/m machines for the cost of my M2 Mac mini.

Which is nice for some of the development work I do, but for a server I personally won't use anything other than Linux, and I wouldn't recommend anything else either. Apple adds some funkiness that can be a complete pain (IMO) with some tools, Linux is the only server solution worth using.

So if you want a Mac, go for it, but if you want a server as the most important part, I'd say get an x86 based bit of hardware.

They should go that far though.

This entire position that things are in are a direct result of a certain party trying to privatize space travel, and "run it like a business", which is how the Challenger disaster happened.

So wouldn't be the worst idea to pull waayyyyyy back.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angela_Davis

It boggles the mind. I can't understand ~30% of the population apparently.

I actually think the opposite shows more.

"The orange idiot calls me a communist, but even these pieces of shit are voting for me over him."

I think too many people are confusing am endorsement by a piece of shit and supporting that piece of shit, like Cheney's endorsement somehow will mean Harris agrees with him.

All it means is a massive turd is saying "Don't vote for the diaper full of massive fascsist turds".

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Nimbus

Project Nimbus is cloud computing specifically in support of the IDF, not an operation.

Wolf Pack is the storage of every Palestinians details, including biometrics (well, the goal for them at least. You know, a special kind of list. Nothing sounds wrong about that, right? Ugh)

It runs on AWS.

As far as your Birth Certificate... theoretically it should be possible to attain a copy through some kind of State records office/website, though I'm not familiar with Ohio specifically.

Vital Statistics

Here's the info from Ohio:

https://odh.ohio.gov/know-our-programs/vital-statistics/how-to-order-certificates