davad

joined 1 year ago
[–] davad@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What is "shutting down"?

[–] davad@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Abortion should be legal in all cases

The thread replying to the parent comment is a good example of how restricting abortion access requires people to arbitrarily decide definitions of when a fetus "becomes human."

It's best to leave that decision up to the pregnant person in consultation with their medical providers.

but a fetus becomes a unique individual when there is clear, identifiable, brainwave activity.

If there's no brainwave activity, it's not a life, no matter how many weeks old pre-birth or how many years old after birth.

This is another arbitrary definition of personhood. That doesn't mean it's wrong. But there are other (equally arbitrary) definitions that are reasonable too. (And there are a bunch of unreasonable definitions, but we don't need to go into those.)

[–] davad@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Even though mobile homes are technically mobile, moving one is expensive

And moving them might destroy them. Most aren't any more "mobile" then a regular home. The difference is that they were manufactured offsite, trucked in, then installed.

[–] davad@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Heroic Game Launcher is pretty cool. It does game save sync with GOG games too.

[–] davad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think part of the issue is how business accounting practices work. When you buy a machine, you can call it a capital investment and count its value as an asset. When you hire a person and cultivate them for years, from an accounting perspective their salary is strictly a liability / expense. Even though that person is an asset in every other way, our standard accounting practices don't reflect that.

[–] davad@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Does anyone have concrete info on the offer and why it was rejected? Reading between the lines, it sounds like some of the issues were:

  • 24% is a lot, but doesn't bring them back to where they were 16 years ago when their last general wage deal happened
  • Contract reduces or removes performance incentives, which might reduce take-home pay overall
  • Some employees are mad that their pension was taken away a decade ago
  • They don't trust Boeing to keep it's promise about building the next commercial jet in the region

Anything else?

[–] davad@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I assume some variation of this exist for other jurisdictions, but in the US, some crimes require prosection to prove "intent" (mens rea) Depending on the crime, you might have to know that it's illegal for mens rea.

In US Tax Court, there's precedence that ignorance of tax code is a defense for criminal tax.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mens_rea#Ignorance_of_law_contrasted_with_mens_rea

[–] davad@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I love the idea, but I don't believe the timeline.

[–] davad@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I've never worked in the UK, so I don't know what the processes are like, but here's my two cents from the perspective of probabilities.

It's possible to have a large, freak accident at an otherwise safe work environment. But if an environment has lots of small issues, it seems more likely for a larger issue to happen there.

[–] davad@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe the equivalent of OSHA in the US?

[–] davad@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

So is price fixing.

view more: next ›