It seems like the developer might do that, but I imagine we can't have any guarantees from a free and ad-free app that aren't given
dewittlebook
It seems like the reason that cheats were removed is because of public leaderboards
The one in the article and linked above does not have ads
I think we can agree that Nazi's are not something we want to assocuate with.
Help me understand, what would you do?
How would you limit the service to
prioritize[s] privacy in order to protect human rights defenders, journalists, and everyday users who value their privacy
but then also filter out Nazi's?
How would this be different from TOR?
"Made up of" -> the non profit consists of software that must be free and open source..?
This is the response I wanted to see but since people seem to hate watching videos (from creators they don't know), iirc the tldw; balancing bulbs coming to full power immediately (as opposed to gradual warm up) and brightness with life span. The 100 year light bulb is cool, but not ideal for actually lighting a room
I can't say I read the whole thing because the technical analysis went over my head, but I don't think we read the same conclusion
Based on the analysis of packet captures above, I believe it is clear that anyone who has sufficient visibility into Telegram’s traffic would be able to identify and track traffic of specific user devices. Including when perfect forward secrecy protocol feature is in use.
This would also allow, through some additional analysis based on timing and packet sizes, to potentially identify who is communicating with whom using Telegram.