If it matters, they're super wealthy, so it might be a class thing where they do it up for holidays
How viable would something like this be for powering a home? Solar panels+this?
I am, personally, one of those gays. Lol
People are gonna people, let 'em people . Frankly, most of the folks angry at religions/the religious have pretty solid reasons to be. Not my place to be rankled by it
When I was a kid we lived in Florida briefly.* On Christmas, we went swimming, did a cookout, and went fishing. It was awesome. Looked it up, it was 82f/27c that day. 2 months later, in February, we were in North Carolina, where there was snow on the ground, and huge chunks of ice floating in the lake at the campground we were staying at. The lake had a giant slide in it, about 50 feet/15 meters. Right in the middle of the lake. Me and my brother could not resist. Ended up swimming there on my birthday. Haha. There's no point to this story, hot Christmas just made me think of it.
*At times like this, I never know if I should explain things like Florida. On the one hand, I'm being presumptuous if I assume someone on the other side of the planet has a working knowledge of one of our 50+ subnational jurisdictions, on the other I'm acting like I have to explain Florida to someone who has access to a super US centric internet... Blegh.
An Aussie friend from a forum I was on ages ago posted a video of his family's Christmas tree, and it blew my mind that they decorated it with snowmen and snowflakes and shit. They had a fire going, a big ass turkey or some such (baby emu?) on the table. Whole freaking classic Christmas affair.
Why? Why do you do this? If it flipped somehow, and Christmas now came during summer here in the US, I'd be decorating the tree with flip flops (thongs?) and sunglasses, and having mojitos with a light salad for dinner lol
Do you have personal experience with it there? If so, how do you like it?
Most socialist states have been authoritarian because most of them of were authoritarian before their socialist movements. They are a product of their own cultures. In addition, most are authoritarian because they're attempting to recreate the successes of the Soviet revolution, and using their system as a baseline.
Also, my first paragraph in that comment was aggressive and I apologize for that. I should have come better than that. But the fact remains, socialism is not the problem. Authoritarianism is. They're not one and the same, nor is one required for the other.
Sure, so let's try nothing, because the current system works so well. I mean, what with us having solved homelessness, having equality, and fixing the climate, I can't imagine why we should do something different.
I understand that you've had a bad experience, and I also understand that the real world examples of nation states claiming to be socialist have been less than ideal, but, as a species, we have to decide what is more important, because we're running out of time. I'm not a Soviet fan boy or a tankie, I'm an anti authoritarian, libertarian socialist. But it's a bit like the US election right now. I don't like Kamala, but I'll take her over Trump, and continue to work outside of that to achieve my actual goals. I don't like state socialism, but it's better than what we've got. If the biggest problem with socialist states has been corruption in the upper echelons of power, then that is excellent real world data to draw from when we considering alternatives to both our current system and the experiments of the past. Strict transparency, more citizen involvement, less concentration of power. Sure, again, not my ideal system, but it's something better. We have examples to draw from, both in failures and successes. Yugoslavia had a lot more personal freedoms than the USSR, and a strong focus on worker cooperatives. Cuba has managed to create one of the best healthcare systems in the world with shoestrings and belt buckles. The USSR gives us an example of just how quickly progress can be made in areas like industrialization, crucial information that could help us in the transition to renewable energy. The US and Western Europe have created citizenry that are unwilling to accept, at least in theory, authoritarian, iron-fist control. We absolutely can create something that blends these philosophies, but it is imperative that it's focus be on the creation of an egalitarian society that works towards ending tyranny, which includes the tyranny of workers, and seeks to solve the climate crises. We do not have a choice if we want to survive the next few decades.
Summer cottage? Family farm?
One fairly straightforward plan is the nationalization of housing. If you own and occupy your primary residence, you may stay. If you have a secondary residence, you can keep it as a vacation home. If you own more than that, they're going to go to the state. Pick two. If you're a renter, and you occupy that place, it's now yours. Anytime someone is moving, the government has the right to first refusal, which it will always utilize. Effectively, the governments buys the house back each time, and then sells it again to someone new. If you die your home can go to a family member/designated person. No one may more than 2 homes, no one may sell a home to another individual directly, though the transfer/sale of a home to a specified individual can be arranged through the government. All rents/mortgages are income based, and payments end after 5 years.
Cuba has done this fairly successfully. Yugoslavia had a similar system. No, it's not the best system imaginable, nor is it super popular with the ~~fucking leeches~~ owner class, but it's viable, doable, and simple enough to set up while insuring that all people may be homed.
I think they're referring more to historical events. Like the great depression and the dust bowl.
I can absolutely see these fucking galaxy brain jagoffs saying you're gay if you sleep with a voting woman.