dumnezero

joined 2 months ago
[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 2 points 20 hours ago

let them fight...

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 4 points 5 days ago

Gambling is part of the problem. You can't rely on luck.

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

A version edited for more clarity:

 

New elements include DOGE’s feed from X, Musk’s social network, and a blank section for savings identified by the agency, promised to be updated “no later than” Valentine’s Day. At the top of the website’s regulations page, DOGE used data published by the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), a libertarian think tank that claims to fight “climate alarmism.”

The CEI’s “unconstitutionality index,” which it started in 2003, compares regulations or rules introduced by government agencies with laws enacted by Congress.

The CEI claims to fight “climate alarmism,” and has long worked to block climate-focused policies, successfully lobbying against the ratification of the international climate treaty the Kyoto Protocol in 1997 as well as the enactment of the 2009 Waxman-Markey bill, which aimed to place a cap on greenhouse gas emissions.

 

Shortly thereafter, Wallnau proclaimed that once Trump took office, "the government and the church" would begin "moving together to build the ekklesia" to take control of "the government mountain" globally. ("Ekklesia" is a term used by dominionists to refer to the church as God’s governing body on Earth.)

Wallnau then announced something he called The Nehemiah Project, which is committed to "partnering the prophetic collaboration of government and church and business together to take all the domains we can while we have the wind to our back."

...

"There are three arteries that make this happen: Legislation, litigation and the shaping of public opinion," Wallnau replied, explaining that they intend to pass laws and file lawsuits to further their Christian nationalist agenda while simultaneously using the power and influence of the media, the government, and the church to shape public opinion in support of that agenda.

"Paula White has to be careful [about] what she says in public.," Wallnau stated. "[But] I believe I might have learned that from her."

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 17 points 1 week ago

It's about time!

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

And what's your strategy for communicating The Big Problem?

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

It's good to tie* long-term trends to experiences. People don't feel the global temperature average going up, but they do feel local temperature going up.

Here's a nice recent paper which includes Bucharest: Estimating future heat-related and cold-related mortality under climate change, demographic and adaptation scenarios in 854 European cities | Nature Medicine

Here's a nice platform to search for records... thanks to MSN: https://www.msn.com/en-xl/weather/records/in-Bucharest,Romania look at the red line.

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

E ridicol cât de mare e diferența.

 

Corporate Europe Observatory has set up Deregulation Watch to help civil society monitor new developments in the deregulation agenda, assess what’s at stake, and organise in defense of strong social, environmental and human rights protections.

On a related note:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_to_the_bottom

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 13 points 3 weeks ago

What happens when system problems conflict with your personal action/inaction/"lifestyle"?

Because if you're not prepared for change and instead are dreaming of a high-carbon lifestyle, you are probably going to vote for cryptofascists who promise more growth, the "American Dream" of car dependent suburbia as ~~cheap~~ affordable, cheap huge screens, cheap meat, cheap eggs, cheap cheese, cheap private commuting, cheap road infrastructure, cheap parking, cheap office space, cheap flights, cheap tourism, cheap low efficiency devices, and so on, while you get into conspiracies about 15 minute cities, plant-based diets (plus insect protein), and others.

Indeed, the carbon footprint calculator itself was developed in 2004 by a public relations firm working for BP. The tool encouraged individuals to calculate their personal impact on the environment, focusing on activities like driving, energy use, and diet.

The carbon footprint existed before that calculator tool was created as a practical measure in the scientific literature. You can usually find it as "GHG emissions per capita".

The same goes for the ecological footprint and its calculators. These weren't invented by fossil fuel corporations, they were used by them for PR.

The message from the Fossil PR isn't that you're guilty, it's that they own you because you are dependent on their product.

What I'm saying is that people need to be ready to end the addiction, to go through the withdrawal. That's a kind of bravery that isn't fostered by consumerism with its convenience obsession. Otherwise, people will just vote out anyone who tries to do something about the systemic problems, and vote in the liars who deny climate change and other systemic problems.