Because it makes the point for a more solid technology as far as privacy is concerned?
dwindling7373
joined 1 year ago
They way I uderstand your comment, LTT is big enought so as to negotiate contracts with sponsor without being forced to share the metric related to the performance of the sponsored segment.
I doubt that's true for many creators.
I'm pretty sure it does, they do see how many people play the segment.
I enjoyed Carto and Paradise Killer, as far as "different and creative" goes.
You have a problem with profits, mate, not with ads.
I'm not disagreeing with you there, but also, I like the things I like to exist without waiting for the revolution.
My brother in Christ, being watched is the goal of any content creator, that's unrelated to advertisements. Now Youtube ads are paid (lets simplify a bit) blindly once you click the video, it's a metric, you see those if you want access to the video.
If the content of the video has the guy saying "thanks xyz for sponsoring this raid shadow legends" that's a contract between the guy doing the video and the sponsor, following metrics agreed between themselves, it has no ties with "the purpose of youtube" simply because... it's not youtube.
Will there be people doing cheap content to get "easy" sponsor money? Sure but if the content suck you won't watch it. It's a loss just like if the motetization was following any other driver (as long as the driver is... watching the thing rather than not).
Well, fuck you as well :)
I wish there was a way to pay for just a single video
There totally is, just send them a low amount of money or do the hwole Youtube Premium thing.
It is not the only point when it comes to adopting technologies, when it comes to maximizing privacy, yes maximizing privacy is tautologically the only point.