You cannot use rsync with Backblaze, nor zfs send | recv. If these are important to you, rsync.net might be worthwhile. That's it, really.
emptiestplace
joined 1 year ago
status quo is worse
iperf3 showed 2.5 in both directions?
-R reverses direction
Also note it can be set up as a daemon - I like to have at least one available on every network I have to deal with.
If this "joke" wasn't referring to "cost of living" in the title, then I guess you're right, but I definitely wasn't upset.
No, why would it be that? They (CEO) are trying to justify a decrease in sales on their watch.
Articles and headlines do not exist in a vacuum. 'Context' is not even remotely straightforward.
I think they are taking advantage of the fact that Mozilla just changed CEOs; folks will be skeptical, and that is worth a few clicks. Even the beginning of the article is more ambiguous than it needs to be. These organizations (not Mozilla) exist solely to get attention, and should not be given the benefit of the doubt here.
This isn't a reading comprehension issue.
Oh no.
Unfortunately I have a lot of experience with this: attaching permanent array members via USB is a bad idea. OP, if it's not too late, and assuming you haven't already and decided to double down on yolo, I'd recommend reading about the downsides of this approach. It is easy to find relevant discussions (and catastrophes) in r/zfs.
Thunderbolt enclosures are a bit more expensive, but they won't periodically fuck up your shit just because.