explodicle

I've been scared to use that ever since they actually solved "Public reluctance to accept weird new forms of money".

If it really ramps up, we could share block lists too, like with ad blockers. So if a friend (or nth-degree friend) blocks someone, then you would block them automatically.

Or the parasitic larva

Calling them weird isn't going to work at all, that's an absolutely terrible idea. Everyone wants weird. We need weird right now, just not their weird. We should be upping our weird game and present options that will work, that centrist libs will say are weirdly communist or anarchist sounding.

Things are about to change big time and it's too late to stop that. The best we can do is shape it into something good. But nobody is buying tickets on the normal train. If you're here on Lemmy, then you sure aren't.

Normalize political energy. Howard Dean should have won.

We need another Nader. Jill Stein just doesn't cut it.

It's surprising the psychological difference of "net seventeen people think you're an asshole" vs "twenty people think you're an asshole, but three people get you".

2009-2017 boomed a little too

This suggestion makes you a crypto influencer now.

Hey what if instead of free adblock, we charged people for it? Also I'll use a little bit of the profits to try banning gay marriage.

Sure, you can change literally everything about Firefox if you pay a time cost. The defaults do matter because that's one more thing to fix when installing it. We could say this about any negative feature.

Here you go my friend