eyolf

joined 1 year ago
[–] eyolf@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Was Shrek only 17 yrs after Various Positions?!

[–] eyolf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

All that - and then you end up using Gnome?!

[–] eyolf@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Amen to everything you're saying.

[–] eyolf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait - you're still running e16?!

[–] eyolf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I remember that one of the things that really blew me away was the virtual desktop pager which was a live miniature of the actual desktops.

[–] eyolf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Could you expand on that? What is exceptional about the feature set, and how does e use the desktop differently?

[–] eyolf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

'not speedy, but ongoing' - That sounds like E, alright ...

 

One of the first wow-moments when I first installed linux (2003ish) was Enlightenment. I though it was very pretty, and quite different from the mainstream WMs. It was presented as a feature, not a bug, that development was slow: the people behind it wanted to take the time it took to get it right.

So I waited. I always installed it on new computers, but it never seemed quite ready to use.

I did the same today, and the feeling is the same as in 2003: it's not quite there yet.

Hence the question: does anyone actually use it as their everyday WM?

[–] eyolf@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I didn't think I would ever say this, but: arch isn't always the answer. True: the last time the entire system broke on me was in 2006'ish, but I can't count the times certain apps have stopped working or some python upgrade messes up things. Sure: that's the price of rolling release and AUR, and I wouldn't be without it, but it's a thing one has to learn to live with, and a thing that makes 'arch' the wrong answer to this particular question.

[–] eyolf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Which functionality is that? I haven't found anything that enters the selected item directly, without having to C-v it afterwards. Besides, the mouse is a thing I want to avoid… I played around with some other functions, however, and I found out that cycling through the history items works fairly well for me.

[–] eyolf@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

That's more or less what I do, but it's not quite killring'y. The workflow I'm looking for is: paste as usual with ctlr-v, then press some shortcut to replace the pasted with the previous item in the "ring", without having to go through the backwards process of first enabling klipper, then choosing item, and only then entering it.

But I'll play around with it some more and see what I figure out.

 

I'm currently using Klipper, and it's fine, I suppose, but I miss the ability to cycle through the previous clips with simple keypresses, like in the emacs killring (the only thing I miss from my very brief experimentation with emacs back in the day).