ezchili

joined 1 year ago
[–] ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'd have liked to see how Replika responded to him

[–] ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 1 year ago

They used median

[–] ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 1 year ago

Assets ballooned and especially homes

64% of the population owns a house so you don't need to only survey homeowners, they're a big part of the population

[–] ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Could we ban that kinda shit for climate change until the planet's unfucked please

(i.e. probably never)

[–] ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I went by what you said.

You literally didn't. You cut it off mid sentence.

It's insane how you've moved the goalpost from "It's impossible to clean snow off bike lanes" to "it's impossible to clean snow off some bike lanes when the conditions of the bike lanes are very specific" to "it's impossible to clean off bikelanes when the city is tiny and too broke to clean it off roads in the first place"

Guess what? Then don't clean them. Discussion has been moved to a segment of the problem that is so small and uninteresting that and if you had been clear about your message in the first place, nobody would've needed to answer you

Bye

I went by what you said.

[–] ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Beyond relevance period?

I thought I meant beyond relevance for urbanism, and by the way I mostly meant for this discussion about snow on bike lanes.

Guy who said "don't put words in my mouth" literally 10 minutes ago

Small towns going bankrupt is a result of newer means of transportation concentrating centers of activity within a region.

If you can't clean the ice for cars, cleaning it for bikes is cheaper. If you can't do any, then don't do any - you've got worse problems. Thus, irrelevant for this discussion.

[–] ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Small city and towns don't have cars now?

Guy who said "don't put words in my mouth" literally 10 minutes ago

[–] ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

I'm pretty sure you can always solve that problem for bikes if you can solve it for cars

If you can't solve it for cars then these places are beyond relevance for urbanism

[–] ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

I can't think of a single place in the world that can't have bikes but can have cars

You cant think to think of any either, to be honest...

[–] ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 1 year ago (13 children)

If it's not separated you just use the regular snow plower?

[–] ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

man, if only there was a place I could both get weed and satisfy my getting-beaten-up fetish

view more: ‹ prev next ›