I think this is kind of reductive.
I mean it's a nice narrative and sounds like what we want to hear but is it really true? Trump has had his metaphoric pants pulled down a bunch of times but he has more influence than ever.
I don't think there's any simple 3 sentence explanation. Trump is a symptom of a complex array of interconnected problems.
I'm trying... I'm trying real hard to be the shepherd ringo.
This is a really valid point, especially because it's not only faster but dramatically cheaper.
The thing is, summaries which are pretty terrible might be costly. If decision makers are relying on these summaries and they're inaccurate, then the consequences might be immeasurable.
Suppose you're considering 2 cars, one is very cheap but on one random day per month it just won't start, the other is 5x the price but will work every day. If you really need the car to get to work, then the one that randomly doesn't start might be worse than no car at all.
Lots of people do lots of things.
I have a second sim card for my phone. I just turn off that sim when I'm not working, and set my status as away for group chat.
In this context, there isn't any tangible benefit to having a second phone.
I wouldn't be surprised if that's how it plans out.
A regular group chat and another signal one for when you specifically need to talk to OP.
Having two phones absolutely sucks. Didn't work for me at all.
While higher prices cab make products more appealing, that is not the primary reason why vegan products are more expensive.
Correct. That's precisely why producers of meat patties can still be profitable at a much lower price point.
It's social media, who's making scientific postulates?
It's a lemmy comment.
I'll never call it X.
It's twitter. Perhaps xitter if you must. On mastodon it's universally referred to as "the other place" which is acceptable.