fl42v

joined 1 year ago
[–] fl42v@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] fl42v@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Other inits cut out udev and logind and run away giggling into the sunset, obviously

[–] fl42v@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago

If you want something like graphene or calyx (I.e. with additional de-googling and security improvements), take a look at DivestOS: https://divestos.org/pages/devices#device-blueline

Crdroid (which claims performance improvements, but also has a lot of customization options; reminds me of now deceased resurrection remix) is also good but doesn't seem to officially support your device. There may be some ports on XDA, tho.

[–] fl42v@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago

Just shove wondows in a VM or something

[–] fl42v@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 months ago

They're more secure (albeit in many wsys security through obscurity) than private, although the privacy aspect is probably among the best you can get by default as far as I can tell. On the other hand, if you're willing to do some relatively simple steps and buy specific hardware, you can achieve better privacy and security on both mobile (graphene) and desktop (qubes) devices.

I personally dislike them for building unrepareable crap, tho.

[–] fl42v@lemmy.ml 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I suspect those may depend on choosing a particular response to some of the previous questions

[–] fl42v@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

CPUs are also somewhat choked. I had to use throttled to make mine run above 2.4 GHz under load. (You need HWP_MODE and possibly Disable_BDPROCHOT, if anyone's interested).

But other than that, waaaay better compared to ..70 laptops, and some models seem to beat maxed out t440p-s. Also quicksync massively speeds up video decoding/encoding, so I'm overall happy with mine so far.

[–] fl42v@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's good and everything (although it was a bit rough around the edges here and there), but is a no-go for me personally, unless they've changed their license. When I last checked it wad not open source, but merely source available since the license basically said you're not allowed to modify the source code period. AGPL would've been a far better choice

[–] fl42v@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

Although, it's possible to bloat it unknowingly: networkmanager, for example, depends on a few VPNs noone would ever need, and one of them depends on webkitgtk, so you actually have to mkForce modules to include only the necessary stuff. Not like that's a huge issue, but I wasn't amused when I saw "building webkitgtk" while cross-compiling 😆

[–] fl42v@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] fl42v@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

Wannabe crapple being wannabe crapple.

view more: ‹ prev next ›