stakes are far too high to have the luxury of this brain dead take.
fosho
joined 2 years ago
because that attitude only helps the objectively more horrible politicians. how is this so hard to understand?
if only wall street fines from the SEC were like this...
there is nothing relevant or acceptable about suggesting that an unhealthy person could reasonably die by being arrested. The methods of arrest are objectively fucking incorrect if they result in death for anyone generally being non violent.
there's a time and place for it. if it's a conversation about detailed opinions then no. but when someone basically asks for a simple definition then yes.
obviously he doesn't as insisted repeatedly and frantically by dick bags like you.
what are you even talking about? you've lost the plot.
heh, the subtle suggestion that one shouldn't have a life away from here is embarrassing.
wowdaft. it couldn't be more clear that the suggestion is discussing the suspicious nature WITHOUT making direct accusations.
it's not libelous to discuss the elephant in the room. you did not explain anything. you just disregarded the question with your assumption.
You absolutely did not. The question was not: "Why don't news organizations claim Boeing execs murdered a guy...?" The commenter was clearly aware of the problem of libel, which you completely ignored. They asked why news orgs aren't discussing the fact that the death comes at a suspiciously convenient time - because they aren't. This is not the same as claiming that he was murdered by Boeing.
how about refusing to acknowledge that repubs would do the same or worse with this situation? no sane person thinks the situation is great. but brain dead is making a voting issue out of this when it isn't one.