gammaray

joined 1 day ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
Are there still any email providers that offer free anonymous registration? in c/privacy@lemmy.ml
Government Surveillance on Chinese vs US made phones in c/privacy@lemmy.ml
[–] gammaray@sh.itjust.works 7 points 23 hours ago

How do you know information is going to China?

"Why is your phone in airplane mode?" in c/privacy@lemmy.ml
[–] gammaray@sh.itjust.works 8 points 23 hours ago

You might want to look into Matrix.

It doesn't require any of that bullshit.

House boosts military budget as Pentagon extends failed audit streak to 30 years in c/news@lemmy.world
[–] gammaray@sh.itjust.works 9 points 23 hours ago

The legislation garnered the support of 149 Democrats. Just 3% of Democratic voters want to increase military spending, but 70% of House Democrats just voted for an increase.

This is a big reason why I'm not loyal to the democrats.

Can we make federation less dependent on domain names? in c/fediverse@lemmy.world
[–] gammaray@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was also considering something along the lines of option 3. I'm not sure of a foolproof solution, even DNS has the potential for imposters and being revoked.

Can we make federation less dependent on domain names? in c/fediverse@lemmy.world
[–] gammaray@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks. This is a little complicated to wrap my head around. Is this already implemented and we just have to toggle it, or is this something that needs a special/unreleased version of lemmy in order to activate?

45
Can we make federation less dependent on domain names? (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by gammaray@sh.itjust.works to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
18 comments fedilink
 

It looks like some issues may arise if/when an instance's domain name changes. Is there any way we can change federation so that we don't need to rely on such a central point of failure?