gianni

Be aware that Brave is essentially a scam and there are other privacy-focused browsers that might suit your needs.

It will happen eventually. Look at FORTRAN, or COBOL, or BASIC, or Pascal, or even Objective-C.

Luckily Wikipedia articles typically include sources:

https://www.osnews.com/story/24882/the-history-of-app-and-the-demise-of-the-programmer/

This is simply not true.

To add, you could have looked this up before posting a hostile comment on a relative newcomer's post. This is how linux communities develop reputation of being exclusive & unfriendly.

I would have to disagree. A duopoly sucks, but it's still better than a monopoly.

Security should be both convenient and default for everyone.

RCS is opt-in. Nothing is changing protocols without your prior consent and knowledge.

SMS and MMS are not very secure however. RCS is technically an open standard. it's mostly controlled by Google at the moment, but hopefully that will change as Apple enters the game this year.

During COVID and in the immediate years after their production started used Tesla held value well.

This was the case for all vehicles at the time due to the supply chain shortages.

Is that really the best way? I believe studies have shown that harsher punishments don't deter crime.

I don't usually find myself agreeing with Danielle Smith but I certainly support this initiative. There are many things to criticize her about, but I don't think this is one of them.

Edit: this feels like a weird piece for the CBC to put out.

You know that's not the same thing.

Making a list of people to fuck can be a bit creepy for exactly the reason you mentioned: consent—or the absence of it.