glarf

joined 3 years ago
[–] glarf@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

I find keeping a phone longer than three years absurd, guess we like different things!

[–] glarf@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

My fold4 lasted 3 years, and still works. I'll concede it was only able to unfold to about 85% open at the end when I decided to upgrade. I was happy to upgrade to the fold 7 which has a redesigned hinge and better dust protection. I acknowledged the risk of mechanical failure as a possibility compared to a slab phone and after using it for years I decided I was still very impressed with the flexibility of having a tablet in my pocket. The fact that my 7th generation is significantly thinner and has a 200MP camera compared to the 4th is what sealed the deal.

It's not perfect for everyone, but I wouldn't go back to using a slab, there's too much functionality I'd be pissed giving up.

Granted, I tend to upgrade my phone every 2 years or so anyway.

[–] glarf@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I recently learned of a term "reverse centaur" and found the ideas in that article were very entertaining as a way to explain why CEOs are obsessed with LLMs. The author of the book being interviewed has a few hot takes that I think are pretty relevant here too. https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/how-to-burst-the-ai-bubble-strike-at-its-roots/

[–] glarf@lemmy.world 53 points 3 weeks ago (15 children)

Two time buyer, can confirm. They're legitimately useful and durable enough for me.

[–] glarf@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Good for you, welcome to the internet where people's opinions abound. I didn't accuse you of writing it with an LLM I said it was an LLM style, if you don't like my opinion, that's fine with me. I simply found the writing style unsettling. Cheers!

[–] glarf@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (5 children)

The description has such an unsettling, overconfident, llm-style tone for a project described as something to challenge LLM hallucinations.

 

I came across this today and I thought it might be an incredibly powerful tool. So I was curious to see if anybody in this community has used it yet?

 

So I was shopping with my wife today and I said "oh let's see if my membership helps out." So we went and added the same item to each of our carts, and to our surprise, the total was the same! So what is it exactly that I'm paying for in this membership if the items "original price" is higher for me than it is for regular shoppers?

[–] glarf@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Yes, I have to agree the problem is not just gun laws, and, in isolation, changes to gun laws would not fix the root of the problem.

[–] glarf@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Yeah, so I guess we should just change nothing, right?

/s in case it wasn't blatantly obvious we are in desperate need of changing gun laws.

[–] glarf@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

Un fucking believable.

[–] glarf@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Here are a few more views:

  1. 3D render

  1. Back side

  1. Silkscreen with front and back sides

 

Greetings again! Yesterday I posted the schematic for this circuit, and today I have routed it as a 2 layer PCB. The intent of this board is for it to be a playground to build autonomous LED animations with the LP5812 ICs from TI, which seem pretty neat.

I'm hoping to get feedback on this design and sanity checks to make sure I haven't missed something when routing this out. I couldn't figure out how to upload multiple photos, so I'll add some more views in the comments. Cheers!

If you're interested in the KiCad files or other related things, I've got it on GitHub.

[–] glarf@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah I hear that some people like to keep the bus pullups closer to the host. The other gotcha is that the voltage for the I2C doesn't have to match the VCC pin and I didn't want to assume that users would want those coupled together. Perhaps I can add some DNP resistors so users can have a choice of a pull-up on the dev board if they like.

[–] glarf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Naturally, just like a making a pull request, I found that my annotations were incorrect for the LEDs (it doesn't functionally change the schematic) after posting. My intent is to have all odd LEDs on U1 and even on U2 so that when I place them in a circle it's easy to make usable patterns with one controller at a time as I learn how to use animation engines.

 

Greetings! I've been throwing this schematic together as I want to experiment with the TI LP5812 IC which is an i2c controlled autonomous matrix LED driver. I am a novice when it comes to electronics so I'm looking to see if I've missed anything in this demo board schematic.

The intended purpose of this circuit will be to provide a playground to experiment with different lighting patterns by allowing the user to interact with two of these LP5812 ICs over i2c as each can only drive 4 RGB leds each.

My main points of concern: Making sure that I haven't missed anything critical in the rather dense TI datasheet https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lp5812.pdf?ts=1710689049125 as well as making sure that my schematic makes sense.

I chose not to include i2c pullups on this dev board as I felt that was best left for the host to configure, but I'm happy to learn. Thank you!

Here's a link to the KiCad project if you'd like to see more https://github.com/scytherswings/Starlight-LP5812-Dev-Board/tree/main

view more: next ›