The subtext I read in this was that opinions are more important than facts and that reporting on the poll results
It's also about driving engagement, a vibes based article about a poll will have a lot more engagement when its shared around social media. Sure you'd still have some people arguing and engaging regalardless, but a large and very vocal portion of the internet has been trained now to just ignore facts that don't fit their narrative as being funded by George Soros or similar such non-sense, they see a title like "data driven research shows economic conditions worsening in key areas" they skip over it as boring and too complicated to understand, but if they see a title saying americans "feel" a certain way, then they as an american (or someone pretending to be american) can chime in about how they personally dont feel that way and anyone who does feel that way is lazy and stupid, and then it becomes a whole chain of people doing that and others citing factual data which then gets ignored.
50% might have been a fair cut if they actually asked for permission up front,but they didn't. Everything made by AI is fruit if the poison tree and should be something equal to public domain.