If they actually wanted to do something about child abuse they'd go after the conserative scum who have historically supported it and still do. Its the ones that vote for far right parties, are anti higher-ed, pro homeschooling, anti secularism, pro religious indoctrination, anti feminist, anti age of consent laws, anti sex ed, anti criminalisation of marital rape, anti combating domestic violence, pro child marriages etc instead they are constantly trying to attack human's right to privacy which only exist on paper.
gubblebumbum
joined 2 weeks ago
There are regulations, they are either inadequate or aren't being applied to products or services used by regular consumers. https://support.google.com/pixelphone/answer/11062200
Also which terms? You can't call yourself an MD, RN or an Attorney etc in US and many other countries if you aren't one. You can't market drugs that haven't been approved by the FDA. Also bastardisation isn't a justification for no regulation.
If "privacy friendly" or "secure" were regulated terms most linux distros would have been sued/fined into bankruptcy for deceptive marketing.
how are advertisers ok with this?
He also invests a lot in localisation which makes his videos appealing to non western audiences.
Their devs dont really care about security so id say its not safe at all.
all it does is prevent sideloaded apps from having access to sensitive permissions by default, which is a good thing.
I have only used it for doomscrolling and watching videos so far. I spend at least 12 hours on it, Im disabled and live in the third world so I dont have a lot going on in my life lol.
i just upgraded from a core2duo with 2gb ddr2 to a 7th gen i3 with 8 gb ddr4 and for the first time in my life an actual gpu (nvidia k620).
Yes and I hope the tech can replace dairy too.
view more: next ›
also fb employee
https://mashable.com/article/facebook-employees-react-teen-spying-app-blind