guyman

Your point was that users can use arch install scripts to automate some of the setup process.

I countered by saying they could just use a distro that has an installer integrated directly into it.

I also added that in your mind, there is no legitimate reason to use an arch derivative. This highlights your bias.

What was I missing, exactly?

Your point was that users can use arch install scripts to automate some of the setup process.

I countered by saying they could just use a distro that has an installer integrated directly into it.

I also added that in your mind, there is no legitimate reason to use an arch derivative. This highlights your bias.

What was I missing, exactly?

Whew, saved me clicking on this bullshit.

Thank you. Journalistic integrity is hard to come by.

Not at all.

I don't care about fedora.

Or just use a distro that sets everything up for you.

Seems like anything is the solution except that in your mind, lol.

Glad we have option 😎

Thought Arch was all about DIY?

None, but bugs stick around way longer in debian stable because of how old the software is.

Did you... really think I was talking about a bugless distro?

None, but bugs stick around way longer in debian stable because of how old the software is.

Did you... really think I was talking about a bugless distro?

🥱

Problem with debian is it's stable in the sense of unchanging, not necessarily a lack of bugs.

He's saying he wants up to date packages and stability, which seems to mean he was current software without bugs. That's not debian stable.

Problem with debian is it's stable in the sense of unchanging, not necessarily a lack of bugs.

He's saying he wants up to date packages and stability, which seems to mean he was current software without bugs. That's not debian stable.

I recommend using Manjaro KDE.