Lemmy and Debian are not the same.
Specifically Lemmy is exactly the same — a direct namedrop in tribute of a known musician or band. It's really no weirder than a band naming itself after archduke Franz Ferdinand, or after Nikolai Gogol 🤷
halm
joined 1 year ago
"He", not "they" — if I understand correctly this was way back when Eugene Rochko was the sole developer — but yes. Same as Lemmy being named after Lemmy Kilmister, and Debian major versions after Toy story characters.
I don't see what's "rich" about that, it's just developers having personal tastes outside of coding.
That's how filters work, yes. Follow a few hashtags of interest to find people who post about stuff you care about, it'll fill back in.
you don’t sell a novel tech named after an extinct animal
They didn't, Mastodon is named after the metal band (which is named after the extinct animal) 🙂
Either way, back in 2008 I bet people were making fun of Twitter for being named after bird sounds, so.
The first rule of Mastodon is "filter the term 'Mastodon'".
While you're at it, filter out mentions of any other social media you can think of. All of that metadiscourse is apparently important for people to get off their chests, buy it's numbing to read.
I'm fairly happy using Mastodon, but the lack of algorithms made it necessary to curate my feed very strictly. I turned off boosts/reposts in my app, too, and I now have a slow-moving, low-drama newsfeed that doesn't stress me out just opening it.
Honestly, when you say
are these distributions doing anything beyond repackaging the latest software?
— I have to wonder what you think is so trivial about keeping your system current with latest bug fixes and security updates?
I don't need or want a distro to radically reinvent itself with every release. I had enough of that fuckery with Windows, way back when — incidentally, also a direct reason I quit that OS. And seeing "big changes" like Ubuntu deciding to functionally deprecate deb packages is... unappealing to me as well.
There are probably sexier updates going on in DEs, but (insofar as a distro isn't wedded to one particular desktop environment) I'm fine to let them hog that glamour.
If Zuckerberg wanted to simply takeover the control of ActivityPub, they could just
Gah, don't give them ideas! 😨
I believe in the importance of strong opinions, loosely held.
For a generally positive and motivational resignation post, I'm pretty sure Mullenweg felt the burn of that from across San Francisco.
Different strokes, dude. Don't get that on your shoes.
It's... a website, they're fairly widely supported. Fill the URL into your iOS browser of choice, it should open.
Hopefully not. They're clearly batting down the hatches and trying to centralise the market around WP.org — at least as far as The Verge calls ACF a "WP Engine plug-in", and (although I'm not sure how accurate that is) Mullenweg shares that impression.
This all feels like an odd subversion of open source software, where maybe the commercial branches of WP are spread thin financially and need to play hardball with rivals to corner the market? I honestly don't know, but Mullenweg's belligerent rhetoric re WP Engine seems desperate and over the top.
I'm reminded of that other time a happy-go-lucky FLOSS founder turned monopolist, although Moxie Marlinspike wasn't suing and being countersued when he personally shut down a third party Signal client in Github comments...