harry315

Guess they'll need a sustainable business model first. I could see an Apple Watch for Android under certain circumstances:

• Subscription based in some way, like iCloud Drive for Apple Watch or whatever
• Limited set of features on Android while getting full set of features on iOS
• Limited to more expensive Pro or Pro Plus Max or Ulta Pro models to account for lost sales of iPhones on the way
• Standalone functionality with Wifi and eSIM capabilities

Semms like damn good news in a way

I like the irony. The people earning a non negligible amount of their income through cars get a modern train line to commute

Funnily enough, I'm 100 % in the same situation like you. Same switching back and forth between the same two devices. Same lack of options afterwards. I'm so out of options I'm even looking into a weird chinese/Hong Kong device named Unihertz Jelly Star. I'm not sure about the screen size though. 3" is a whole inch smaller than an iPhone SE 2016. That's damn small, even to my standards

Easy. Just pressure cook it at 4.5 bar (65 Psi) in your industrial grade pressure cooker.

Being realistic, I guess someone accidentally swapped Celsius and Farenheit?

EDIT: Nope, seem to be wrong. They do mean 145 degC. On the other hand, I found a source reporting that 57 % of a total of 58 cases of shiitake dermatitis actually thoroughly cooked their mushrooms. Cooking won't save you from this, as it seems.

Study: Ha, JH; Byun, DG; Kim, SM; Yoo, CH; Park, CJ (2003): Shiitake dermatitis in Korea; clinical and histopathologic study. Korean J. of Dermatology, Vol.41 (4),pg 440 – 444

Bot is drunk, forgot the key takeaways, so I pasted them for you:

Working with material scientists, they’d developed a way to make concrete without using carbon-intensive cement.

Partanna says its mixture can cure at ambient temperatures, so it doesn’t have to use as much energy. It also says binder ingredients in the mixture absorb CO2 from the air and trap it in the material.

pretty impressive, especially these animations.

What I find most interesting, though, is that there were only 250 Million daily active users in the first place. Musk paid like 176 bucks per user. There's no way he could've milked that much revenue out of the users in any reasonable time frame.

Sure, there's weekly and monthly active users, but how many ads can you possibly show someone who spends 5 minutes per week on formerly-known-as-Twitter?

really nice, and very reasonably priced add ons. Not like the compania with the big A charging 25 bucks for a camera cable adapter or something

That's a damn good explanation

Nein out of ten don't seem to be amused at your joke.

Who could have guessed that an ancient and forgotten image format suddenly gets that big of a revival.