haverholm

joined 1 month ago
[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 22 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Like most articles on itsfoss, this one is only a notch over clickbait — a kernel of an idea not fully developed, written with the last minute energy of a student who pushed off the assignment until right before deadline — but I'll be damned if that title isn't beautifully turned.

I haven't had to have Windows installed for more than a decade, but on recent occasion I've borrowed Windows and Mac computers for work. Those revisits didn't give me reason to switch back, only to long for my lean Arch install.

As the next major version of Windows approaches like a Santa down the chimney with all sorts of "AI"-infested gadgets in his sack, I do hope more will make the more often mentioned switch to a Linux distro from the ~~advertising platform~~ OS that came with their computer.

But this headline deliciously reminds us that there is already a good chunk of users who made the jump, or are sitting on the dual booting fence, one boot (sorry!) on either side. This article is for them, yes, but also a gentle nudge for those still gathering courage.

At this stage, it is time to seriously change the perspective of that switch. The single reason for switching from Windows to Linux is ... the utter state of Windows. Only the most blinkered of tech journos can continue to pretend that all is well on Windows, and not at all a sophisticated malware infection.

So bravo itsfoss for the clever barb, less so for the depth of the article itself.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 3 points 5 days ago

Ooh, that is salty! Will give it a try next time the family isn't around to turn up their noses at my kitchen experiments.

Yeah, Nutella... I think it was the banana+pizza search query that sent me into crêpe-adjacent dessert territory.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I'm genuinely curious, can't find many banana pizza recipes that aren't smeared with nutella as well. I assume this is a white pizza base since you mention mascarpone? Then banana topping with a sprinkle of grated hard cheese?

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 2 points 5 days ago

Oh absolutely! That's pretty much a 400 year bracket starting with Disco s1 (2257 CE). Plenty of opportunity for Mirror Universe shenanigans even beyond the Picard years.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

What was ~~Cronenberg~~ Kovich's line about that again? "The Mirror Universe has been drifting away" or some such?

I'm willing to bet the Terran Empire tried some multiversal invasion that exploded in their collective face and blew them across the quantum plane (if that's a thing). The Quantum portal could easily be written into that.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 1 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Tell me more, I'm a glutton for punishment.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 8 points 6 days ago (4 children)

This show has been a balm for my worst nerd impulses since episode 1, and I will miss it. As finales go, I think this was damn near perfect, too.

Like others have mentioned, Rutherford's sudden frustration with the Cerritos felt a little off to me, but that's really small fry in the larger picture of

PREVIEW_HEREa bona fide, stable quantum portal to parallel universes hanging around the Alpha quadrant since 2382!

Wow, you'd think that would have been brought up even tangentially in Prodigy or chronologically later set shows? It could even feasibly have been used to

PREVIEW_HEREbring Mirror Giorgiou home to her own universe in Discovery s3.

But what do I know, it might not be as stable as it looked in this episode...

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 2 points 6 days ago

Good to know, I'll brace myself for disappointment when I try out Docker next 😄

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Oh, I tested YNH for a while on a local server, and I wiped the whole thing when I saw the mess it made of my file system. I must have a deeper need to know where everything goes than the urge for convenience 😄

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 2 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I was eyeing microblogpub for a while, but now that development has stalled I'm coming around to GTS as well — should I ever self host a single user fedi instance.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 6 points 6 days ago

There are different ways of approaching microblogs — reading, writing and interacting. You have @s and hashtags in mind already, they're a good way of finding conversations and engaging with people.

You'll find users who write interesting stuff about your favourite subjects — you'd want to follow those to get all their updates. That includes boosts/reposts, i.e. posts by others that those you follow share to spread a message. That will also help you find more interesting people and organisations.

Now, interaction. I have come recently to Lemmy from Mastodon instances, and I see quite a bit of difference in the etiquette and forms of socialising. Two generalisations that I can think of:

  1. Mastodon and other fedi microblogs were built by users who were fed up by Twitter's lax moderation of harassment, so they built in safeguards against that; Lemmy was made in reaction to the commodification and heavy handed enshittification of Reddit, but largely expect the same conversations here. They are not the same mentality.

  2. On Lemmy, you post a question or thought in a dedicated community to get answers or start a discussion. Each community has its own room where the discussion is centred around one subject. On the microblog side, you might imagine one big, sprawling social club where people mingle and form smaller groups to talk about one thing, then disperse and join other conversations. And sometimes they just talk about their pets or hobbies to nobody in particular.

Sorry, I'm writing this over morning coffee and I know I'm only covering broad fragments of the microblog experience as it differs from using a forum. I hope it helps though.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And in your understanding, Google are somehow superheroes swooping in from on high by ... putting the thumbscrews on a union website?

I get you have an undefined grudge against publishers, but you're kind of off the mark here.

view more: ‹ prev next ›