hawkwind

joined 2 years ago
[–] hawkwind@lemmy.management 6 points 2 years ago

And it’s only a matter of time until that detection can be evaded. The knife cuts both ways. Automation and the availability of internet resources makes this back and forth inevitable and unending. The devs, instance admins and users that coalesce to make the “Lemmy” have to be dedicated to that. Everyone else will just kind of fade away as edge cases or slow death.

[–] hawkwind@lemmy.management -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The data to build it is there. Ftfy

[–] hawkwind@lemmy.management 5 points 2 years ago

Agree. Farming karma is nothing compared to making a single individual polar-opinion APPEAR as though it is other’s (or most’s) polar-opinion. We know that other’s opinions are not our own, but they do influence our opinions. It’s pretty important that either 1) like numbers mean nothing, in which case hot/active/etc. are meaningless or 2) we work together to ensure trust in like numbers.

[–] hawkwind@lemmy.management 4 points 2 years ago (5 children)

In this context it would be an account with the sole purpose of boosting the visible popularity of a post or comment.

[–] hawkwind@lemmy.management 16 points 2 years ago

IMO, likes need to be handled with supreme prejudice by the Lemmy software. A lot of thought needs to go into this. There are so many cases where the software could reject a likely fake like that would have near zero chance of rejecting valid likes. Putting this policing on instance admins is a recipe for failure.

[–] hawkwind@lemmy.management 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I actually wrote it with the flip side of your centralization argument in mind. If a community exists outside of the popular ones a user may never even know of its existence. Having more show up SHOULD be better to prevent centralization no? It requires the users to change their browsing behaviour but at least they don’t have gonsearching offsite.

[–] hawkwind@lemmy.management 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] hawkwind@lemmy.management 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There is some discussion. https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/2947

I am still fairly confident that it shouldn't be storing images, but I'll admit my pict-rs directory is growing quite fast compared to the database. Have to keep a close eye on this.

[–] hawkwind@lemmy.management 2 points 2 years ago

It can be on instances with lots of users and open signups.

[–] hawkwind@lemmy.management 18 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Donate to the Lemmy project, but also look at donating to your instance / instance admin. It ain't free to host and operate this stuff.

[–] hawkwind@lemmy.management 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They're not supposed to, and don't call me friend, buddy.

[–] hawkwind@lemmy.management 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

EVERYTHING by default. Also working on "discover only" for searching without the subscribe-to-everything. That said: It's far less than 3GB per day for EVERYTHING I can see, plus: you don't HAVE to keep it forever. Were you doing something that got other than text?

view more: ‹ prev next ›