hddsx

joined 2 years ago
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca -4 points 1 month ago (28 children)

He’s wrong if he’s supporting Newsom

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Is it actually a preferred name or is it a stage name?

Also how did puff daddy become diddy? I never understood that but I guess if I cared more I would have followed it closer

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That’s irresponsible. I never loaded my gun this morning. I was bringing it to the shop to try a new sight

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you want a religion based on the infallible Donald Trump? Because I don’t. He won’t be alive to insult them anymore so they’ll just project what they want to believe onto him.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Why is arch under “don’t want to learn”? I learned a lot of what I know about Linux from using arch.

That being said, the chart is supporting my inkling to try Nix… must be accurate

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Ok so I said cremated for a reason. If you leave bones (aka left to rot), there are crazy people who will look for his bones because he was their idle. If you cremate him, there are no bones to find.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Trump doesn’t deserve a grave. He should be cremated and his ashes should be dumped into a coal power plant since he’s so passionate about that

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That last part wasn’t really necessary.

I was under the impression that the DOJ has the ability to confirm the existence of the photos because they have access to the safe or the contents therein.

Maybe I should have read the article. It’s more speculative than I was led to believe from the comments lol

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It is absolutely evidence, but the evidence isn’t conclusive and doesn’t prove anything by itself. If you can get someone to testify that they are in the picture and what date it is, you have a stronger case.

At the very least, if the person in the photo is underage at that time, you can paint a pretty damning picture for the right jury. Furthermore if the person in the photo is underage and testifies to sexual conduct, you have an extremely good case because the fact that there is a picture of them together gives her immense credibility. I’m not a lawyer but I’m pretty sure sexual conduct with a minor has always been sexual assault and illegal so…

view more: ‹ prev next ›