hddsx

joined 1 year ago
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 months ago

I was planning on reinstalling windows on my desktop (apparently removing a basically blank hard drive prevents windows from booting) until I saw this. Now I have two arch machines lol

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago

Wait, did he funge the non fungible token? 🙃

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lmao. It’s not my job to promote your content.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That’s not true. A breeding fetish does not actually aim to produce offspring. Otherwise, people will breeding fetishes would have a LOT of children.

Musk is something weirder. IIRC, he believes that we should try to produce as many offspring as possible to help repopulate the earth or something

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The point is you should post content and not a link since you control the content. That’s it.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago (5 children)

This isn’t Reddit. What does your decade old Reddit account have to do with lemmy?

And there’s a difference between avid reader of lemmy posts than driving people to read your blog.

If an article is paywalled, you can generally ask OP to post the content so that it can be read. And here’s the thing, the poster of news doesn’t have control about what is written in the news article. But you have control over the content on your blog.

So why are you posting a link instead of the actual content? It’s because you’re shamelessly promoting your blog. It’s a different story if a third party ORGANICALLY finds your blog and finds it share worthy, but this isn’t that.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Shameless blog promotion that could have been a regular post…

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

That’s stupid. There was no software at the time of founding and no precedence in England at the time. Therefore price fixing was never intended to be regulated.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 56 points 2 months ago

That’s amazing. The bullet that struck the victim was not the cause of death, but the bullet before?

So if an LAPD officer goes to raid someone’s home, and a gangster kills a bystander, the officer is responsible? If he hadn’t gone out for the raid, the gangster would not have fired the weapon?

Wait but if the officers in Taylor’ case didn’t show up to the door, her boyfriend wouldn’t have fired the bullet. So it’s the police fault

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Good luck with the next scandal

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Good luck training 6000 more employees

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I would continue to strike

view more: ‹ prev next ›