Except if you know the amendment will fail and you know the amendment is a stunt by a racist conspiracy theorist, you can't be expected to take it seriously.
But again, what's the endgame for this criticism? She resigns and someone more centrist or corporate or right leaning takes her place? She feels bad and remembers next time to virtue signal meaningless gestures instead of attempting to achieve plausible goals?
So you acknowledge it didn't have a chance of passing and was thus of completely null value, except as far as you get to use it to attack someone for not virtue signalling your preferred message. And it's really super important to drag her because doing so will magically help more leftists come to power in the US and topple the authoritarian regime...? What's your end game on this strategy? You'll die on a useless hill from a MAGA boot on your face and your last satisfied utterance will be, "at least we told AOC off that one time," is that it? Do you think this witch hunt will have any useful results?
AOC still voted against blocking military aid to Israel.
No, she didn't. Any number times zero is zero. She could have voted for an amendment to kick puppies and then voted against the bill and thus ultimately voted against kicking puppies. You don't seem to understand how bills and amendments work.
What result do you want to happen here?
At issue here is the first vote only.
The first vote was meaningless. It was a political stunt amendment by a racist conspiracy theorist. And a single vote for or against the amendment has no chance of affecting whether Israel got funds for more genocide.
This yearly military budget bill always gets passed, without exception, which AOC knows. She knew that, in the end, the bill would get passed despite her nay vote.
It's really weird that you're able to see this inevitability, yet you're not able to also see the inevitable failure of the amendment MTG put forth. This is exactly why all this foaming at the mouth over a doomed amendment vote is so misdirected! It had no practical, functional, or realistic bearing on anything in reality other than for MTG to tell her conspiracy theorist followers that she opposes Jewish people getting more space lasers or however she wants to spin it.
That being the case, why did she vote against removing military aid to Israel?
She explained her reasoning. Why are you asking what she intended when she already explained why? I don't agree with the reasoning, but it was still a meaningless act.
You're complaining she put expired ingredients in a meal that she threw out and never served anyone. Meanwhile Trump is dodging Epstein list revelations, ICE is brutalizing and human trafficking (and genociding) immigrants, but at least we have someone to attack and feel morally superior to who literally didn't fund Israel as was falsely claimed.
I think the claim that she funded or supports funding genocide by Israel is contradicted by the very public and verifiable voting record on the funding bill that continued funding Israel to which she voted nay. The entire premise of the attack is that she did something she didn't actually do.
Yes, I'm aware what they were quoting. It doesn't hold any meaning. It was a non sequitur.
Definitely don't feel like you have to have done something "significant" already. A bunch of people don't figure out what they want to do until their 30s or 40s or even later. Your brain won't even finish developing for several more years. A big favor you can do for yourself is not have high expectations for what's going to happen. Set a reasonable goal for yourself such as "discover five new things that interest you over the next five years."
Try out some new activities that might be fun. Try to notice patterns of what types of things you enjoy. Do you enjoy being creative? Test out different mediums. Write, draw, learn to play an instrument, see what you like.
Talk to people who already do the stuff you might want to do. Ask them how they got started. Sometimes they can even help you get started. I had a guy give me a free soldering kit when I was in my early 20s because he was making cool stuff and I expressed an interest in the same.
I was depressed in my teenage years and I'm on the spectrum. I didn't have the benefit of knowing I was on the spectrum, so you've got a leg up on understanding yourself more than I did. Not everybody on the spectrum experiences the same patterns, but my flavor lets me deep dive into topics of interest and learn a lot of specialized knowledge with hyper focus when I find something I'm really interested in. The beauty is there are likely hundreds of these topics to find interesting and pursue.
I started with a lot of digital stuff on computers like digital photography and graphic design and modding game content because it was cheaper and easier than buying and accruing a lot of physical materials for a new hobby.
If you're looking for new friends or relationships, you can often meet interesting people while pursuing a hobby. Having something in common is a good starting point and provides easy topics of conversation. Don't put too much pressure on yourself about it though.
I don't like to exercise, so I've learned to trick myself into getting exercise unintentionally while doing something else that I do find interesting, such as going on walks to explore a neighborhood or playing a video game that involves physical activity like Dance Dance Revolution. If it's too hot outside, find a large indoor area like a mall to walk around in. Maybe listen to podcasts or audiobooks while walking. There are a ton of free audiobooks available online, such as Llibrivox recordings.
What is being discussed here is that she voted for military aid by voting against MTG's amendment that would have blocked $500M of military aid.
False. She voted against an amendment by MTG that had no chance of passing and voting for or against it was not voting for military aid for Israel. It was a waste of time and a political stunt by a racist conspiracy theorist. The aid was provided by the bill already. Voting against the bill is how you vote against the aid to Israel. And that's what she did. Discussing the amendment that had no chance of passing is like blaming someone for what they did in a dream you had about them.
It's a literal fact. She voted nay on the bill. You've literally posted screenshots of her post citing the voting record. You keep pretending that everything you reference and link to says something different than it actually says.
You did. Are you not tracking the thread?
That AOC didn't vote for funding genocide, a fact you continue to ignore.
That's what ranked choice voting can get you.