hopesdead

joined 7 months ago
[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 56 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Shouldn’t Church and State doctrine (or whatever it is called) immediately make all of this illegal?

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Unrelated but that movie was disappointing. But I’m also someone who didn’t like Army of Darkness.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 2 points 2 months ago

Is she confusing Democrats with Drakken from Kim Possible? Secondly, he used that machine to control Canada. So jokes on her.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You wanna be Bella Swan, the teenage girl with depersonalisation disorder or Edward Cullen, the predatory 104 year old vampire?

The vampires in Twilight are described as have unique powers. Edward is a mind reader.

  1. He is attracted to a teenager whom he tries to stay away from at all times.
  2. Bella has no thoughts. Edward is never able to sense a single thought from her.
  3. Midnight Sun, the latest book, is set during the first book, which is about Edward’s period which he ran away from Forks, Washington (the setting).
  4. Are you sure you want something associated with 50 Shades of Grey? That book series is Twilight fan fiction. Even the movie adaptation of the first book goes as far as to copy fscenes from the first Twilight movie.
  5. Oh and one of the characters is a werewolf who is supernaturally destined to fall in love with Bella’s unborn child.

EDIT: I have thoughts about Twilight, none of them good.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you actually believed that, then wouldn’t you give up on an illegal third term?

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 11 points 2 months ago

I would immediately cite anti-LGBTQIA+ sentimentality as the contributing factor. While lots of people understand that homosexuals aren’t the only people who can contract the infection, I’m sure the treatments being aimed primarily at homosexuals as the highest risk group, will make certain people unwilling to believe it is a potential risk.

It sucks that safe sex isn’t a thing being discussed. However it does feel like anti-abortion laws would be unnecessary if teens had access to sought information. I’m sure with the advent of Internet based pornography, teens are being influenced more by that with no educational tools to say that people in pornography (I am sure not everyone across the industry follows health guidelines but for the “professionals” you’d hope they do) have access to testing and other health related care.

If we are going to be cynical about this, one reason I suspect sex education is no longer being thought would be to fall inline with twisted alt-right/conservative values about women NEEDING to have children. With lack of information about contraception, teens might believe they can’t be safe. Maybe they actually have access to contraception but aren’t aware. Maybe contraception is being banned. If you have no contraception, then the rate of pregnancy will increase and maybe those anti-abortion lawmakers wish to see more unwanted pregnancies instead of anyone wishing to engage in recreational sex that doesn’t aim for procreation.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 6 points 2 months ago

There is a Tabletop episode for Star Trek Catan which has his son Ryan and Jeri Ryan as the guest. Had to mention that.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Maybe when the first was written, sequels weren’t even considered yet?

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 8 points 2 months ago

Look, he wanted to meet Jack and he got to meet Jack. I’m happy for Wil.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Tickets are already available. I bought mine today. Check your theater(s).

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago

I’ve heard supposedly those people got severely taxed for doing that.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Taxes? I don’t know full details or if this is even tangentially related (or maybe it is the same thing). There is a supposed practice as some universities (maybe just the non-UC’s and Cal State’s) that if you were a relative (I’m assuming immediate family only) working at say USC for example, you could get accepted into the university without paying tuition. The only catch was you got severely taxed (something like 30%; of what, I don’t know) for attending tuition-free.

view more: ‹ prev next ›