humanspiral

We need to get Clinton, now being persecuted by White House for Epstein links, to say "I did not have sexual relations with that man, Mr Trump." as a non-denial.

If we don't deflect from Zionist Supremacist control of US, then Iran wins.

Conspired with Russians

Never allow this disinformation to permeate. Epstein was key Israel intelligence/leadership figure. Barak would take orders/suggestions from him to not inform Mossad leadership of his information/tactics. The funding for his honeypot blackmail program came from the circular US aid to Israel to US political interference/domination programs of Israel.

US oligarchy allying with Zionazi control of US is simply their path to pilfer all of US wealth, because if money equals speech, then money = zionazi+allies control.

ridiculous take. 90s were good because great money was made in the west through Yeltsin corruption of Russia.

When no longer a client state, CIA/west took usual nazi diminishment attitutes towards it, and any Russian blind eye to neonazi click farms for GOP voting action, is simply not Russia's obligation to stop western implosion.

time when western libs finally understand Russia is not their friend.

It is neoliberal majority that supports war on Russia, and embraces the propaganda, that the US ever stopped hating/diminishing Russia. The new definition of tankie is that supremacist war on Russia is deserved, and not even the point that it is a losing proposition matters. You're a tankie even if you just don't want to bankrupt the west, or the signal of losing a demonic war will embolden more resistance to warmongering justifies collapse for trying.

This is the most ridiculous topic/attack in the history of cybersecurity.

A LLM can be used to accuse someone without proof that their TLS traffic is on a banned/blackmailable topic.

The way TLS works is that the actual LLM provider gets all of your decrypted traffic. They are already encouraged by government/NSA/political in groups/Mossad to share anything of interest, or to datamine for future considerations of interest.

Even if this training dataset gets a 98% correct rate on whether you are a pervert, that should only be good enough to serve you ads for boner pills, until the minority report dystopia, just uses it against its political enemies.

A classification problem is correlation vs causation. Sunspots and mini skirts have been correlated with stock market returns to some degree, but it tends to be a tenuous connection not guaranteed to hold up over time, or to actually have any meaningful relevance whatsoever. It's easy to oversell models.

Dystopian neutrality in article.

without discriminating on grounds of protected characteristics

AI classification is trained based on supervised (the right answers are predetermined) learning. MechaHitler for the fascist nationalism's sake, will rate Obama's face as a poor employee, and Trump's as the bestest employee.

Open training data sets would be subject to 1. zero competitive advantage to a model, 2. massive complaints about any specific training data.

For some jobs, psycopaths AND loyalty are desirable traits, even though they can be opposite traits. Honesty, integrity, intelligence can be desirable traits, or obstacles to desperate loyalty. My point is that if there are many traits determined by faces, much more training data is needed to detect them, and then human hiring decision based on 10 or 30 traits matching to a (impossibly unique) position, where there direct manager only cares about loyalty, without being too talented, but higher level managers might prefer a candidate with potential to replace their direct manager, but all of them care about race or pregnancy risk, and then post training based on some "illegal characteristics".

A Gattaca situation where, everyone has easy time getting great job, and moving to a greater job, OR being shut out of all jobs, creates a self contradicting prediction on "loyalty/desperation" controlability traits. If job duties are changed to include blow job services, then surely those agreeable make a better employee, despite any facial ticks responding to suggestion.

Human silent "illegal discrimination" is not eliminated/changed, but the new capability, you can use a computer to do the interviewing, and waste more interviewees' time at no human cost to employer is why this will be a success. A warehousing company recently looked at facial expressions to determine attention to safety, and this leads to "The AI punishments to your life will continue until you smile more." Elysium's automated parole incident interviews is a good overview of the dystopia.

tech firm salaries

link to what this means?

yes. they never went into Ukraine, or even referendum liberated new Russia.

It's more in Europe, though I don't have data. Just the last 10 years has had an incredible amount of +5-10C days, and eastern Atlantic/Arctic is warm in late fall.

relative zero is an even number! There I said it, and I don't care what any of you think of me.

spill proof drink containers are game changer!