hypna

joined 2 years ago
[–] hypna@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Qatar has much better relations with Iran than most Arab states. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Qatar_relations

[–] hypna@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Maybe they're betting that the telcos have more money for their legal departments than the FCC does. I wonder though if it's true that a jury can award damages in excess of the requested amount in the case of regulatory fines the same way juries can when deciding civil suits for damages. Maybe.

[–] hypna@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is what the internet was made for

[–] hypna@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

They promised to not attack them, not to defend them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum

Clearly Russia broke that agreement, but the US, UK, France, and China haven't.

[–] hypna@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

No love for radical skepticism round here I see.

[–] hypna@lemmy.world 28 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I tend to think at some point that was true, that Tesla was about saving the planet and SpaceX was about making humanity multiplanetary.

It could be he was always a wretched creep and just really good at hiding it, but it seems to me that the wealth and power just ruined him. He wouldn't be the first person to fall in that trap.

I'll append my confession here.

I supported Ron Paul once upon a time. The non-interventionism appealed to me in the context of the Iraq war in particular, and the rights-based libertarian philosophy seemed sound. I was young.

[–] hypna@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Is anyone using Veilid for anything yet? Last I checked it was more an interesting experiment.

[–] hypna@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Problematic - it's just so lazy. Makes me doubt whether the speaker has any coherent reason for why they don't like the given thing. Might as well say 'yucky'. It's the kind of word one uses when assuming everyone already agrees with you, and if they don't, well then they're probably problematic too. /rant

[–] hypna@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't know much about Machado, but I do know that polls conducted under dictatorships are often not worth much.

[–] hypna@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Looks like Noam Chomsky embracing Steve Bannon

 

Would really like to know who the employer is.

 

Why do so many philosophers value anarchy but refuse to call themselves anarchists? Why don’t philosophers draw on the classical anarchist tradition? How can we think de facto anarchism as distinct from dawning anarchism? What is at stake in doing so? Does philosophy need anarchism? To answer these questions, in Stop Thief! Anarchism and Philosophy (Polity Books, 2023), Catherine Malabou reads submerged counter-revolutionary themes in the texts of several key philosophical thinkers. By doing so, Malabou helps us understand the ways in which philosophy has left anarchy unthought, while also stealing from it, and disavowing it. What emerges in her analysis is the importance of the non-governable, not just as a problem for philosophy, but as what opens towards other ways of sharing, acting, and thinking.

I enjoyed the interview. May try to make time for the book too.

15
New Books Network (newbooksnetwork.com)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by hypna@lemmy.world to c/books@lemmy.world
 

The New Books Network is a consortium of author-interview podcast channels dedicated to public education. Covering 100+ subjects, disciplines, and genres, we publish 70 to 100 episodes every week.

I just found this today, and the first couple episodes in intellectual history have me excited. Can't properly vouch for the quality broadly, but I like the idea, and am going to be digging in over the next few days. Maybe check it out.

view more: next ›