inefekt

joined 11 months ago
[–] inefekt@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

2023: when some random tweet is enough to prove someone is guilty. The collective stupidity of humanity grows with every passing year...

[–] inefekt@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Do they need to explain why? Wemby has good counting/raw numbers but his efficiency and advanced metrics are woefully bad (negative BPM, negative WS, terrible TS%). Chet's would be elite for a veteran, let alone a rookie.

[–] inefekt@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

people downvoting this are morons....they lost the title, lost as many games in the playoffs as they had in the regular season, had a worse record going into the finals than the 96 Bulls (and obviously afterwards too) but the truth hurts people's feelings so they just downvote to make themselves feel better

[–] inefekt@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

The thing with the 'greatest team of all time' tag is that it isn't really warranted when you include the post season. Why you would discount the hardest part of the season with the best competition and most intense defense is beyond me. Whatever, going into the NBA Finals the Warriors had already lost an additional 5 games and their overall record was sitting on 85-14 (0.856). The 96 Bulls had lost just one additional game before heading into the 96 Finals and were sitting on 83-11 (0.883). So when people say the Cavs (and LeBron) beat the greatest team of all time, it's not actually true.

[–] inefekt@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Remember when Garnett said Poole would be the next Harden, likening Poole leaving GS with Harden leaving OKC back in the day.....
Also remember when Garnett said Thon Maker was a future MVP?
Yeah, Garnett has some of the worst takes in NBA history lol

[–] inefekt@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Booker getting that Kawhi bounce

[–] inefekt@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

absolutely insane they looked at multiple replays that show Sabonis literally throwing his shoulder into the defender yet they still upheld the decision....if there is any evidence you want that shows how offensively biased this league is, just show them this

[–] inefekt@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

I like how an offensive player can literally throw himself into a defender and get a free point for it....NBA just needs to come out and say it, 'defense is hereby made illegal in any and all forms'

[–] inefekt@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

is any father-son duo beating peak Arvydas & Domantas Sabonis? Steph & Dell? Klay & Mychal?

[–] inefekt@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How about responding to someone like a civlised human being instead of a miserable, arrogant prick?

[–] inefekt@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

If that's what you get joy out of then you're a miserable person...

[–] inefekt@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Just explain something to somebody without being a douchebag...it's not hard.

 

Pretty much all of the efficiency metrics revolve around shot attempts - FG%, eFG%, TS% etc. Each has their weak points and none take into account the value of all three of the different shot values - 2pt, 3pt & FT while only TS% takes into account the actual points scored by the player. It also includes a somewhat arbitrary multiplier for free throw attempts.
 
Why do we not measure the efficiency of a player based on points only? So basically, the amount of points a player attempts vs the amount of points he eventually scores. To me, the two metrics reflect the difference between great scorers and great shooters, they are not always directly proportional.
 
Example, a player attempts 10 two pointers, 5 three pointers and 5 free throws per game throughout a season. He ends up averaging 5 made twos, 2 made threes and 4.5 made free throws. The total points he attempted was:
 
(10 x 2) + (5 x 3) + 5 = 40 points
 
He succeeds in scoring:
(5 x 2) + (2 x 3) + 4.5 = 20.5ppg
 
His scoring efficiency is therefore:
20.5/40 = 51.25%
 
His shooting efficiency, based on TS% is:
20.5/((15 x 2) + (4.5 x 0.88)) = 60.36%
 
Applying scoring efficiency (ScEff) to some all time great scorers/shooters:
 
Michael Jordan -
TS% - 56.9%
ScEff - 54.1%
 
LeBron James -
TS% - 58.8%
ScEff - 52.6%
 
Steph Curry -
TS% - 62.8%
ScEff - 50.7%
 
Larry Bird -
TS% - 56.4%
ScEff - 53.4%
 
Kobe -
TS% - 55.0%
ScEff - 49.7%
 
Harden -
TS% - 61.0%
ScEff - 50.3%
 
Wilt -
TS% - 54.7%
ScEff - 53.4%
 
Interestingly, Jordan moves from the 4th best TS% of that 7 player group, to 1st place in terms of scoring efficiency. Curry goes from 1st to 5th. Jordan is widely regarded as the greatest scorer of all time and Curry as the greatest shooter of all time. Kind of apt that they would swap places on these lists.

view more: next ›