Basically, people are dumb and think that the current economic situation reflects only current policy, whereas in reality it takes several years for a policy to affect the economy significantly. I mean i don't have any love for Biden, but the fact that the inflation started at the end of Trump's presidency and continued into Biden's was due primarily to Trump policy. The fact that it slowed finally is due to Biden policy, but now that Trump is taking over, he'll take responsibility and immediately go back to policy that breaks the economy again, but only at the end of his term. This is one reason he's unlikely succeed for long if he to tries to seize power illegally and would have been way worse off if he had won his second term. His policy effects would be under his watch. Also why single term presidents are often less reviled than two term ones historically.
irotsoma
I mean that's standard practice. If a feature, product, or company develops a bad reputation, just rename it. If your market is large enough there will be enough people not paying attention to not realize it's the same product.
Where do you live? What are the laws around recording another person without their consent. Note that usually audio recording in public is more restrictive than video in public, so assuming he didn't mute the audio of the clip, you probably have a case there.
As for the suggestion about DMCA takedowns, that depends on of the information you shared could be considered copyrightable since the recording copyright belongs to the person doing the recording. That's not common, so you could file a DMCA takedown, but I have a feeling it might not be legitimate. There might be other YouTube terms and conditions that they violated, though. Check the "Report" button for the options. I don't have an account anymore to look.
That's not really how it works. The components of the scale require a certain amount of current especially if it's digital in nature. As a battery approaches being drained, it produces less current. Less current can often power an analog device to a lesser degree, like lighting up an indicator light or LCD or even the IR LED light on a remote, just very dimly. But the tolerance of the weighing components is probably much less than the tolerance of the LCD panel or LED bulb. So many devices use an LCD or indicator LED bulb to show that the device isn't necessarily broken, it just needs new batteries.
If it's sitting in a drawer and getting drained, then it's probably not turned off properly or it may be the type that turns on automatically when it gets pressed down and inside the drawer it's getting activated. Instead try taking the batteries out of any device that sits around for a long time without use. It will prevent accidental draining and also reduction the likelihood that the batteries will leak after a time. I usually pop the batteries part way out or put them in a small bag that I attach to the device with tape or a twist tie. Just make sure they aren't touching anything metal and that the poles aren't touching each other. Batteries will lose charge over time, but with alkaline batteries, that's usually years, not months. Rechargeables generally take much less time, though.
I'm not one to defend Trump...ever...but this one is ridiculous. He was talking about war and whether she would push for war if she had to go into combat. If anything, this investigation plays into Trump's hands.
He's just trying to sell the upgrade so people will throw away their old cars and buy new ones. But that already happened with the last version and it still can't do it. This won't be any different with him in charge. Put an engineer in charge, invest in the tech, and you might get there. But Tesla is not going to ever get there while it needs to sell every incremental advance in tech rather than spending time and money on lots of iterations of prototypes that don't need to be mass produced.
Lifetime of the universe is infinitely less than infinite time. So they solved for the wrong problem. Of course it may take longer than the life of the universe, or it may happen in a year. That's the whole point of the concepts of infinity and true randomness. Once you put a limit on time or a restriction on randomness, then the thought experiment is broken. You've totally changed the equation.
Unfortunately, a lot of women have been brainwashed to think that it's only "the others" that they're after and that they're safe. Even Hispanic Women are still voting for Trump because "it's only the illegals". They don't realize it's not about that, it's about creating a group that is "other" to blame. And once all the "illegals" are gone and things aren't any better they'll continue to the rest of the Hispanic people. Once their children need an abortion to save their lives, they'll be the ones in the funeral homes.
You have to put on a show that you are sticking to those processes, on paper. But the fines for data breaches are generally way less than they save on not having a fully funded IT department and using security products that someone got a kickback for rather than the best product.
"Hacking" isn't some magical, intensely creative process for geniuses loke on TV. For the most part, it's usually just finding the really common things that IT departments don't do because they are underfunded and treat IT people like replaceable cogs. There is software out there to exploit those deficiencies. So they are forced to do things like use default or obvious admin passwords because who knows who is going to be there tomorrow to fix something and without the proper tools to store credentials, there's no way to properly secure things.
And when a security vulnerability is found, there's a reason why many don't bother informing the company before going to the media. Those companies pour tons of money into lawyers to avoid admitting the fault, often getting the innocent person who found the problem arrested, and never fix the actual issue. Just ask any pro whitehat security researcher not hired by the company all the things they have to do to protect themselves from being sued or arrested for "hacking" when they notice a problem.
And government technical auditors are a rarity because the regulators are underfunded. So they might go through some small list of things during regular audits, but they don't know to check if a DBMS system that contains backups and is stored "in the cloud" is using a default password or other common hacking targets. Hackers don't go after the primary infrastructure most of the time. It's not necessary because there are so many sloppy processes or left over insecure projects that "the last guy" was working on or that got defunded before it was completed, but only the primary infrastructure gets audited usually because that's all there is time and money for.
As for going somewhere else, there often aren't other places to go and when there are they usually have the same problem because there's very little reason for any of them to compete with each other. Most industries have consolidated so much that there are only a handful of parent companies left so it's easy to collude just because their leaders are often all in the same room at conferences and such.
Yeah, considering how bad banks and other financial institutions are at IT security and the fact that there's no incentive for a capitalist financial institution to fix that problem, it's not a good idea.
$10k for a serviceable minivan or other vehicle that would work as a primary car for parents? What about the problem that most households need two incomes and very few can commute together due to different schedules and locations and adding even an extra hour or two of daycare in order to share a car is often as much as a second car payment.
As I said, $25k is probably plenty for a small sedan for a single person who only uses it for commuting and grocery shopping, but not likely for people with multiple children that a small sedan or coupe would not work, households with multiple income earners, households with teenagers who also need a car to work, or all the other scenarios where a single, small, used sedan that's just good enough for a short daily commute is reasonable.
$550 in car payments for a houshold is not unreasonable for the vast majority of households and usually doesn't equate to frivolous spending.
Sounds like they prefer this outcome for some reason. Maybe they made some mistake they're covering for, or maybe the situation is just so complex with poorly written laws that he might end up being allowed to stay for a long time while it's all worked out. This gets him out of the building and makes him someone else's problem.