isVeryLoud

joined 2 years ago
[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

You do know dying from cancer is a long, extremely painful death, right? They will die anyway, one path cuts the pain and lets them have a proper goodbye, the other is extreme agony as their loved ones watch them wither away in pain.

We can't save people now using technology that has not been discovered yet, that's not how any of this works.

I'd wish you had stage 4 bone cancer so you can tell what pointless chemo rounds and / or dying from slow organ failure feels like, but I'm not that kind of person. I do hope both sides of your pillow are warm tonight, however.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

Sonic ring floatie > boat

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 24 points 3 months ago

Love it, I have a vibe coding colleague I will use this with.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 months ago

Good. Turns out ignoring CIRB is how you get a conversation going. Hopefully this keeps happening.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You have my attention, please elaborate.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

If you know anything about car security, you'll know that chip and key immobilizers are miles apart from smart fob authentication, and that any vehicle from any manufacturer using a smart fob is vulnerable to a wireless relay attack.

I think someone is being paid to not understand the difference here. I think Hyundai cheaping out on immobilizer chips is unacceptable, but I also blame NHTSA for not requiring it in the FMVSS, Canada had none of the US' problems with Hyundai / Kia thefts because the CMVSS requires an immobilizer since 2007.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

We need to get rid of FPTP, which the liberals promised to do years ago.

The NDP might get rid of FPTP, but we were not guaranteed a strong NDP this election, so we may have simply ended up with a CON / LIB government had we voted for NDP in greater numbers.

We should chat about this over Matrix if you're willing :) I think both viewpoints are valid, it's really just a question of risk to reward.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

...how would they have won is my question.

There was near 0% probability of them winning, and almost 50% probability of the cons winning.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

Can you provide us with a template and list of addresses to mail these grievances to? I'd like to mail my MNA as well.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (8 children)

Of course, but they would never be elected. I would 100% vote for NDP if they had a glimmer of chance, they did so bad their party almost disappeared.

It was a vote against the conservatives, who would cause direct harm to our independence and marginalized communities.

What we have here is a different kind of evil. Neither evils are acceptable, but it is a quantifiably lesser evil. We, as the people, have to twist their arms to make them do our bidding.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (13 children)

There's no one left to elect we would be happy with.

The NDP is an absolute mess.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago

I think he may either be deceased or moved on to living on a farm in the middle of nowhere tbh.

https://github.com/laurencedawson

view more: ‹ prev next ›