ivn

joined 1 year ago
[–] ivn@jlai.lu 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It has some deal breaking limitations:

  • No filter list that can be updated, you have to update the whole extension to update filters. This adds delay as it has to go through Google verification process, they could even refuse some updates.
  • Not every type of rules are available on MV3, so it has to drop some filters.
  • No CNAME-uncloacking.
[–] ivn@jlai.lu 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I don't think it's the same source code (uBOL vs uBO). And it's definitely not the same logic, that's the whole point, blocking with MV3 must be done in a declarative way.

[–] ivn@jlai.lu 36 points 3 months ago (6 children)

They do kill uBlock Origin. The Lite version is a different extension.

[–] ivn@jlai.lu 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes but that's not the same. Because of Chrome limitation it can't update it's blocklist directly. You have to update the whole extension to update the blocklist and that goes through Google validation in the Chrome store. It adds delay and Google could even refuse some updates. The blocklist is also shorter because not all filter rules are supported.

[–] ivn@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago

You are right that there are underlying causes that needs to be addressed. That's why it spread so much and so fast. But that doesn't make racially motivated fake news OK.

[–] ivn@jlai.lu 2 points 3 months ago

But this seems easy to automatically block, no? If a client is querying an unknown domain check for some Matrix related data in /.well-known/ and add it to the block list if there is. And since the servers are publicly advertising the port used you just need to periodically check the list of known matrix domains you are creating in the first step.

Russia is already doing DPI and blocking ESNI so that seems easy. A more widespread usage of ECH would help everyone, as is Signal advocating, but that's not the case yet.

[–] ivn@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

But no one is saying that a single tweet started all this.

[–] ivn@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago (4 children)

But what's the link with the arrested woman?

[–] ivn@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago (6 children)

I did not know about Rotherham, what's the link between the two?

[–] ivn@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago (8 children)

She has not been jailed and we don't know what she posted.

Obviously there is no ground to ban every news but I agree something should be done about politicians and media spurring hate.

[–] ivn@jlai.lu 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

What would a blockchain provide here?

[–] ivn@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago (10 children)

A fake news meant to stir up racial hatred.

view more: ‹ prev next ›