jatone

you asked, I answered. fun fact: I bet a significant number of people who frequent this forum can handle the total size.

as for indexing the music.... basically every music player can do that automatically. you dont need to filter it. there are up and coming players which make indexing and storing the data cheap and easy and integrate directly with p2p technologies.

As I said classic FUD. I didnt say it has no risks but certainly not to the level people are implying here. just talk to your fing doctor people if you have concerns before trying it. not hard.

as i said similar to the old horror stories surrounding THC/CBD. you can also have terrible adverse reactions to antibiotics. psilocybin has a decent and researched safety profile. the set and setting is so you dont have a shitty time while tripping. set and setting is definitely important but not for the reasons your implying.

uh huh. overly dramatic much. go ahead find me a similarly sized dataset of music. ill wait. until then point stands.

because its a 1 stop shop convenience is king vs having to manually go and source every song known to man. =)

your beliefs in the second paragraph are mostly just FUD. similar to the old horror stories around THC/CBD.

as the torrentfreak link states at the bottom anna's is holding onto them for now until the heat dies down.

indeed. i also havent seen a blood drive in ages....

If I was ever in a position to need blood then imminent survival will be priority over PFAS contamination

this is a obvious take. its just an horrifyingly self centered article. 'donate blood because it removes potentially damaging compounds from you! you're a good person by doing so!' its embodies so many things wrong w/ people.

the fact where the pfas go is never mentioned is either: deliberate or the people on the decision making tree for writing and publishing this article are hopelessly self centered as a group. neither is a good thing.

facepalm reduced from the donor and increased in the receiver apparently. be nice if the article included how the donations prevented the PFAS from getting to the patient....

think we can enlighten the maggots to switch their diets?

police doesn’t always appoints the perpetrator at random

they (and people like yourself) believe they do, but errors in information/how they interpret information that led to the selection of any given individual makes even the perp brought in by the police potentially random.

the 'intent' of the police is immaterial to the facts of how the process actually unfolds. when your high confidence witness' produce a 12.5% error rate on a line up between 6-8 people. you are literally in the realm of a coin toss. in that study the %ages for when the witness selected a filler were worse than random.

now agreeably the police are often essentially running a drakes equation for selecting the perp. but thats still entirely reliant on the quality of the information they are using for their identification. and often the line up is run early in the investigation. where they may only have eye witness information.

and since none of that information was provided by the OP you dont get to assume anything about it.