joshhsoj1902

joined 2 years ago
[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I also enjoy Navidrome. What does Musicassistant add for you? Seems like it can do a whole lot

[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yes, when combined with the switch 1

I keep retyping what I want to say, but I think my feelings come down to:

  1. There are 150 million switch 1's in the wild, that's going to continue to be a massive pull for developers when porting new games.
  2. Many families may already have the switch 1, are the exclusives enough of a pull to encourage those people to upgrade?

I do think the switch 2 will do just fine, but I also think there are a lot of people who loved their switch 1 who might look at the games they played, and look at upgrading to a steamdeck instead of the switch 2.

[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

When did lies become hyperbole?

You said something untrue and then tried to continue to justify it as if it were true. If you were indeed trying to make a joke by exaggerating that should have been your initial response to my question, but instead you run into it.

You don't have to dumb anything down, if anything you need to step it up a notch if you're trying to pass off lies as truth 😛

Edit: if you're curious, what you did isn't hyperbole at all. Hyperbole would be suggesting that Brookfield will own all the rental properties, or something along those lines.

Trying to state that the government is planning to work with Brookfield to do this program isn't hyperbole unless there is a grain of truth to exaggerate, which there isn't. You can't exaggerate a lie and turn it into hyperbole.

[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It doesn't matter what carney was the president off. You said that Brookfield would be the owner of these houses, and based of the evidence we have and you provided, there is zero proof that that's the case.

There is nothing else really to discuss. You made something up and stared it as fact, and you acknowledge that it's at best a guess based off weak connections.

[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I thought they were meant to be sold off to the private sector for short term gain

[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Where did you read that?

[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago

I played this a bunch back when it launched. I did enjoy it a fair bit.

[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I think uptime Kuma can be configured to look for expiring certs

[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

The list of items Canada is adding a tarrifs to has also been released https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-retaliatory-tariffs-united-states-trump-1.7448559

[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

I only asked my question because the original commentor was suggesting that US prices were going to go up because Canada was adding export tarrifs.

I assume that because they deleted their comment they realized that wasn't true.

[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Which products is Canada putting an export tarrif on? This is news to me.

[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What is aegis in this case? (It's way too generic to successfully search for)

 

The arguments being made by opponents only make sense if you ignore some awkward facts

 

If Canada axed its carbon tax– and rebates- this is how different households would gain or lose.

High-income households would tend to be the biggest winners, lower-income households hurt the most

view more: next ›