kersplomp

joined 2 years ago
[–] kersplomp@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Feel free to add it to the list. It's Wikipedia.

[–] kersplomp@programming.dev 20 points 1 year ago

Cool, you should add those in and find some sources. It's Wikipedia

[–] kersplomp@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The government had a warrant, read the article.

It's just made confusing by the fact that the thief had signed into the victim's phone, so it makes for a good clickbait story "police got the wrong guy's data"

[–] kersplomp@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If by "when asked" you mean "given a search warrant with very clear evidence that this man had stolen a car", then... Yes? I'm not sure what you're trying to prove here.

The ex-boyfriend had signed into the guy's phone. It's not like the police just cast a wide net and randomly got his data.

[–] kersplomp@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Look I never said I disagree. My point to OP is just please don't make up shit that straight up isn't true. Pick a real issue, not some made up paranoia.

[–] kersplomp@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Re 1: People keep lumping Google with Amazon and Meta, but Google does not sell your private data and alerts you if it finds out the government to accessed your data. People keep assuming that because the general tech community sells data that Google does it too, but check their privacy policy or just ask anyone who's worked there. They don't.

User data at Google is locked up tighter than fort knox. That's why the Snowden leak was such a huge deal, because the NSA was taking advantage of a security flaw that Google didn't know it had to scrape user data. Google patched it immediately after they found out.

Amazon, Meta, and Uber, are much less scrupulous.

[–] kersplomp@programming.dev 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

TIL there are like no women on lemmy

[–] kersplomp@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago

Absolutely agree, you're preaching to the choir

[–] kersplomp@programming.dev 71 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Snopes: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/homeless-man-vs-corporate-thief/

It's true, but note that Allan received a reduced sentence for testifying against the actual mastermind of the fraud, who got 30 years.

[–] kersplomp@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

Vindicated. I will now be accepting apologies from everyone who downvoted my previous comments on this

[–] kersplomp@programming.dev 14 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Honest question, why does the fediverse like firefox so much? This is not a common opinion to have on the internet, but everyone here and on mastodon seems to have it.

[–] kersplomp@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Yes. The problem with cookies was that they could be used to track and identify you. If this can't do that, then what's the issue?

view more: ‹ prev next ›