key

joined 1 year ago
[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 24 points 1 day ago

Literal scum of the earth

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 4 points 3 days ago

Torture? My genitals and not in a fun way.

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 5 points 6 days ago

Oh man this has me feeling nostalgic

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 6 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Why are the alternatives all so defecatory...

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 14 points 2 weeks ago

I noticed that icon in the play store the other day. I assumed it was a scam/copycat app trying to be distinct enough to avoid a takedown or something.

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 10 points 3 weeks ago

Great, now my apps can get AI anti-features and breaking bugs even faster

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 22 points 3 weeks ago

This is the first I've even heard of "Concord"

Sounds like I'm not missing much

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 17 points 3 weeks ago

Fundraiser to send CEOs on a French vacation?

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

My Galaxy S21 can do that as well.

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"software developer says ai will not replace software developers" feels very John Henry

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 25 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The Pixel 9’s updated design language is giving iPhone from the front

Cringe

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 4 points 1 month ago

I can't find any source for this besides the register article. An IETF draft was written for it a week ago, no indication it was accepted.

59
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by key@lemmy.keychat.org to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
 

I was reading an article on the new LG display with a refresh rate of 7680Hz and it says:

While a typical refresh rate for a monitor might be 60Hz-240Hz, an outdoor display designed to be viewed from a distance needs to be much higher

The idea that there's an intrinsic link between refresh rate and viewing distance is new to me and feels unintuitive. I can understand the need for high brighteness for far view distance. I also could understand refresh rate mattering for a non-persistent (CRT) display. But for an Led display surely you can see it far away even if it refreshes once a second?

Refresh rate normally needs to be high enough to avoid pixels "jumping" between refreshes on high resolution displays, so wouldn't higher view distances allow you to decrease the refresh rate?

Is the article just spouting bullshit? Or is there an actual link between refresh rate and view distance?

view more: next ›