key

joined 1 year ago
[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It says this works via the cli but the docker cli works by talking to the socket so don't you still need socket access? With podman you just need to startup the user-level socket and set a few env vars and testcontainers works fine. I'm maybe missing the "why" it's important to avoid direct socket access? Is it to avoid configuring SELinux?

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

Good old autoerotic bondage.

...Affix-iation?

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Seems the pitch is just that it supports Apple specific bells and whistles like the emoji bar and beyond that has the stuff other terminals have. I use tilda and use that because it has a critical core feature I haven't seen in other terminals: it appears full screen over all other windows with a keypress and disappears the same way. Since I use terminal heavily I don't want to treat it as just another window but as a first class experience which tilda allows. I don't really get why you'd make yet another terminal without some fundamental core functionality difference like that.

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Code should be generated from documentation generated from code

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The features described could be accomplished with a PIR motion sensor. I don't see any reason they'd go to the expense of adding a camera, especially since infrared is better for operating in the dark like you'd expect for an alarm clock that'll need to be able to wake kids at 6am in the winter.

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 6 points 1 month ago

So two candidates failed to submit their paperwork to get onto the ballot but the state in a bizarre display of proactive incompetence put them on the ballot anyways? The mistake eventually got caught and taken to the court and of course the court rules they have to follow the process dictated by law. And now Raffensperger is saying it's too late to change (which, ok understandable) and worse, is doubling down on his mistake by falsely claiming votes for them will be counted when the court has established they can't be?

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Tragic that people are still falling victim to these hope-rot schemes. Had an experience with facilitated writing schemes with family members 20 years ago. From non-verbal to shockingly eloquent in no time! It's a miracle, turns out they were a genius trapped with an inability to express themself! Oh isn't it strange that some people just can't facilitate with them and what they say/know changes with the facilitator? Oh well, but thankfully the facilitator can always tell you what is meant when they use uncommon abbreviations!

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 24 points 2 months ago

Literal scum of the earth

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 4 points 2 months ago

Torture? My genitals and not in a fun way.

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 5 points 2 months ago

Oh man this has me feeling nostalgic

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 6 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Why are the alternatives all so defecatory...

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 14 points 2 months ago

I noticed that icon in the play store the other day. I assumed it was a scam/copycat app trying to be distinct enough to avoid a takedown or something.

59
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by key@lemmy.keychat.org to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
 

I was reading an article on the new LG display with a refresh rate of 7680Hz and it says:

While a typical refresh rate for a monitor might be 60Hz-240Hz, an outdoor display designed to be viewed from a distance needs to be much higher

The idea that there's an intrinsic link between refresh rate and viewing distance is new to me and feels unintuitive. I can understand the need for high brighteness for far view distance. I also could understand refresh rate mattering for a non-persistent (CRT) display. But for an Led display surely you can see it far away even if it refreshes once a second?

Refresh rate normally needs to be high enough to avoid pixels "jumping" between refreshes on high resolution displays, so wouldn't higher view distances allow you to decrease the refresh rate?

Is the article just spouting bullshit? Or is there an actual link between refresh rate and view distance?

view more: next ›