khepri

joined 3 years ago
[–] khepri@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

So are we just kind of admitting that there exists no way to expose any networked device to the internet securely? Because if it's not possible for PLCs I don't see why it would be possible for any device. If water utilities have to take these offline, then how does that advice not apply for every internet-capable device in every commercial and industrial facility worldwide?

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Nut & Bolt is getting added to the repertoire. Something about how the double meaning relies on changing them from two nouns to two verbs tickles something.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

And their premier vehicle, the CyberStuck

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

With a name like that you could say they were screwed from the start.

There could be a whole thread just on the variations of that concept, but the most obvious for a gas station has to be "Pump and Dump"

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah man, who do you think all these execs and consultants in charge of these build outs are asking haha. "Hey ChatGPT, should we make more ChatGPT?" "Yeah buddy make all the ChatGTPs that's a great idea, would you like me to massage your ego and greed centers next?"

 

I'm thinking things like "Same-sung" For Samsung, because all their products look kinda generic and boring, or Ford standing for "Fix Or Repair Daily" because of the engineering and build quality, or "McDiabetes", for obvious reasons.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I suppose a state can sign it's rights away in a contract just like any other entity, but I'd love to know if one EVER HAS. Because I don't think that's up to GEO and ICE to determine between the two of them which laws they are obligated to follow or not. At first I assumed that ICE had gotten some actual US State to agree to this, which would be horrible but at least would make more sense than a private fucking company and a federal agency unilaterally declaring they won't follow the laws of the state they are operating in, which is what this appear to be.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I know chip and RAM fabs are incredibly difficult and expensive to build, but how is the several trillion $ out there just up for grabs for anyone that can undercut the like 4 companies that have one not enough for tons of huge companies to say "I don't care what it costs, I don't care what you have to do, because even if I pay 50x what it costs nvidia to make a fab, I will still be scrooging like a villain"?

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

Oh that is just standard copy straight out of the union-busting playbook. In law you would call it "preserving the objection" which basically means they know it's BS but at least if they don't back down from it they can burn more time and money because now the process has to accommodate for all this "pressure" "confusion" and "misunderstanding" that po' 'ol liddle Wikimedia just can't make sense of.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

If whoever is writing the lower thirds for FOX had ever been to a library themselves, they might know that the comma there is totally incorrect...

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Remember the words of Martin Luther King: "When you're marching in the streets try not break anything."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iz1GBlGLFWs

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Well go revisit that , it is peak 90s overblown comedy action schlock, which is objectively the best genre of movie lol, and I'll go read Perdido Street Station which sounds dope.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Oh I know they know. And they know we know they know. Did you know zat?

 

Let's get mad like the gif days.

view more: next ›