korthrun

joined 2 years ago
[–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Right?! I'm surprised that I haven't just run out of internet yet, but here we are :D I'll be sure to post about it when it happens ;p

[–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

I am fast and loose with blocking on all platforms. No regrets.

It's often not even personal. Sometimes someone expresses a mild dislike of cats and I'm like "don't need your noise".

Repost a hilarious meme that I whole heatedly agree with, but with the word "fuck" poorly crossed out? "Algo-speak promoting motherfuckers", roll of the dice on my mood, probably blocked.

My Guild Wars 2 ignore list is full of people labeled "says boiz too much", "annoying fashion", "made bad joke about bees".

There are so many people on the Internet, it's fine. I've taken this approach since MUDs were in fashion and I am pretty confident that it's only served to improve my online experiences.

[–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 week ago

Try walking in to a deli and urinating on the cheese.

[–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago

Nooooo don't invoke the wrath of the hydrohomies!

[–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago

I have no desire to argue that :D Fuck those fucking fucks until they're totally fucked.

[–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Consider a usage other than "fear". Think of something hydrophobic. Do you really think that an inanimate surface is afraid of water?

I don't think it's technically incorrect, I think folks have been taught an overly narrow usage of the suffix.

[–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Check out the fzf shell bindings. Reverse history search with fuzzy matching is one of the features.

[–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago

Moar like haole moco amirite?!

[–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 3 months ago

Well, I tried shovin' a wiener in the warp drive, but it dinna do a bit of good. By the by, would ya have a wee bit of mustard up on the bridge?

[–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 3 months ago

This is why I have issues taking rawstory seriously.

A story about a story, but not examining the journalism, just ... a story about a story.

A link supposedly to watch the story that is actually just a link to the page you're already reading.

The included clip is to youtube, not MSNBC, and it's not even to the official MSNBC youtube channel which absolutely does have this same piece posted.

[–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 months ago

Fuck I hate this.

I run into this most often on sites for TV shows and movies myself.

[–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I understand that we exist under capitalism and that it costs money to host and distribute these videos.

I'm willing to pay for access to this service by letting an ad play (probably while I'm pouring a glass of water in another room and have my speakers off).

What gets me is a 3 minute ad on a 44 second video. Interrupting the middle of a sentence with an ad is also annoying. Placing a 30 second ad in the middle of a song can also fuck right off.

Find an appropriate spot for your ad, and make it's length sensible with regards to the length of the content I'm watching. Or just don't offer an ad supported tier of your service.

view more: next ›