lemmyng

Right?!! Consider this - if you replace the scroll wheel with two buttons, which one would you press to scroll down?

Also missing the Doctor.

Betteridge's law of news headlines strikes again!

Retaliate with Pakleds!

Perhaps this will change your prospects.

The author of the site works for Brave. The results need to be taken with a grain of salt. Is is more private than Chrome? Absolutely. Is it the best browser for privacy? Ehhh...

"Glitch"

Here you go https://archive.is/6IMPP . Don't bother though - it's a vapid article built around a single anecdote.

As in contract law, the solution is to eliminate overarching or vague promises. Instead of promising to "balance the budget", have them produce a budget plan. Instead of promising elections reform, promise election reform pilot programs. And let's not kid ourselves, election promises made in good faith are a rarity these days. It's time to make it harder to lie to the electorate.

Punishing the breaking of election promises would be a start. Those are not ambiguous or unintentional, and it should be punishable as a breach of contract.

He refers to the fact that the web app does not have default access to your device sensors, microphone, storage, etc.

Good article for discussion.

Health checks is one situation where kubernetes really shines. It makes a clear distinction between readiness probes (when the pod is ready to start serving traffic), liveness probes (when the pod should be considered dead), and startup probes (when the pod has finished bootstrapping). Coupled with autoscaling it then becomes acceptable to have a pod stop serving new traffic when it's too busy, because other pods can be created in a short time to take the extra load.

Including backend checks in your application depends on its nature. I think the mistake that the article's author made was not to include the checks, but to have too big of a blast radius when the check fails.