Xfce 4.20 Wayland on the way but need times...
letbelight
It's as other said, headless. Sometimes I only need to check if the signal strength is alright, as I use that machine as servers and host several service on it.
Ah alright. 😂 Thanks for pointing out the mistake. Appreciate it.
example : Early Goodix Fingerprint :/
No, I don't think so, as Red Hat only source revenue is RHEL and cloud, not fedora. And RHEL still open source, just you can't get the builded binary from red hat, but you can build it yourself, as open source means the code is available for public, and it's available for public, and most of the codes are in CentOS stream, https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/src
And most of the Enterprise linux downstream could inspect and use rhel code, just the binary and how to build is restricted, it's still adhere with the GPL/LGPL in my opinion
Fedora Xfce is also great on old HW, and have SELINUX if you are paranoid with security.
Thank you for confirmation!
I'm agree with this point of view.. CIQ narrative have too much conflict of interest. In my place, most corp are happy with CentOS Stream being able to be the upstream test before landed on RHEL. At least now they don't need to long to put on Fedora to be landed on 3 years cycle like old times...
What I hate is CSD.. using it with CSD is sad for #xfce user :'(
Oracle DB are sucking a lot of money, but they fork RHEL for free...(well it is open for everyone), they offer more expensive contract on top of Oracle DB, what a free estate.. haha... Nice work ORACLE... :/
For production server? No. mostly NixOS is for desktop.
Ansible cover what nixOS doesn't in Debian/RHEL space, and it's idempotent and better than nixOS config. Unless they change their approach for server, I don't see any way in near future it will be massively adopted.
Firefox is suffering if one use M365 online daily...
Only Google workspace great on Firefox ootb..