loo

joined 1 year ago
[–] loo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

16 is still enough for me? I currently play RDR2 on high settings and QHD on arch linux and I always have minimum of 3 GB to spare

[–] loo@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Not a puzzle game, but Noita throws you right in without any explanation or tutorial. Everything is trial and error to the point where people complain that you can't figure things out without the wiki. Love the game though, one of the most unique games I know.

The Souls games never really held your hand either.

Hollow Knight, The Binding of Isaac and Elite Dangerous are other games I can think of that want you to figure things out.

[–] loo@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Same for me. Additionally it's just super slow

[–] loo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I get what you're saying, but I've been upgrading my PC over the years and still noticed that with games of big game companies, they care less and less about performance. I firmly believe that publishers, in an attempt to cut costs, tell the game studio to not prioritize performance, while trying to rely on software like super resolution algorithms, to make their games run. In some instances they reused old game Engines for a new and bigger game, for example with Cyberpunk, Stellaris and Elden Ring. Smaller developers are doing everything they can to make a game run smoothly. The best example for this is Factorio. That is my opinion and I totally understand your point of view.

[–] loo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I think that's just the state of triple A games

[–] loo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (5 children)

The game looks better and better, but the performance just keeps getting worse On my PC I can't get the game to run properly since they switched to UE5

[–] loo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Finally. Some good fucking news.

[–] loo@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Thanks a lot @KryptonNerd@slrpnk.net & @tychosmoose@lemm.ee! Couldn't find that option in Gnome Tweaks, but in the Gnome multitasking settings, there's an option to disable hot corners. I don't know why these settings don't show up, when you search for 'hot corners' in settings, though.

 

[SOLVED] Go to Gnome Settings > Multitasking > Disable Hot Corners

I'm on NixOS 24.05 and I'm using GNOME 46.2 (Wayland) and whenever I hover over the upper left corner of my screen all apps are showing as if I clicked the "Show Apps" button. Is there any way to turn it off? It's driving me insane. Since I'm working with multiple monitors, it's happening quite frequently. Thanks in advance.

[–] loo@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] loo@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I've always been using nano, but since I refused to ever read the docs, I'm still confused

[–] loo@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

My first distro was Ubuntu and I've been very happy with it. Many hate it for being bloated or because of the snap package manager, but in my uninformed opinion I think it's a solid choice for beginners, since everything is already set up and ready to go. On my laptop I'm trying out NixOS, but I'm having more trouble setting that up and it's better for advanced users, I believe. Many also recommended Linux Mint, which is also good for beginners, but doesn't have the snap package manager like ubuntu does.

 

tl;dr: Security concerns for my Linux partition, when running Vanguard on Windows?

Now that Vanguard is out, I can't play LoL on Linux anymore. I'm running a dual boot setup with windows and I'm using it only for stuff I can't get to work on Linux, so there is no personal data on there.

  • Are there any security risks for my Linux partition, if Vanguard is installed and running on my Linux partition?
  • Could Vanguard potentially access my ext4 Linux file system via Windows?
  • If my NAS is mounted on Windows, could that also be a security concern?

I'm grateful for any kind of feedback, since I'm not very informed in terms of rootkits and kernels!

view more: next ›