lvxferre

joined 8 months ago
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I gave it a check. If Pocketpair plays it smart they can make Nintendo look like a herd of muppets in the court, and even potentially acting on bad faith. Pocketpair might also simply change a few elements of its own game through an update, much like PvZ replacing Michael Jackson zombie with a disco zombie.

I'm not even sure how much patents apply to games.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Front right, keys and lighter. Front left, cigs. Rear right, wallet. If I must carry my phone with me it'll be probably in the front left pocket alongside the cigs.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 12 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Nor the whole idea of capturing opponents to raise them and make them fight for you. That's from 1987 already, from the Shin Megami Tensei series; it predates Pokemon by a fair bit.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Good catch - you're right.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 39 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Claiming "multiple patent rights" without mentioning smells like kafkatrapping.

I think that Nintendo's delayed reaction was to gauge how much money it could get from bullying Pocketpair to accept some unfavourable settlement outside the court; if too little the costs would be too high to bother, considering the risk, but now that Palworld sold a bazillion it's more profitable to do so. It might actually backfire if Palworld decides to go through the whole thing, I don't know how Japanese law works in this regard but if Nintendo loses this certainly won't look good for them, and even if they win it might be a pyrrhic victory.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 40 points 1 day ago

Have the router ask the server if there's an update available when turned on. If none, proceed as usual; if there is, force the update, regardless of the time of the day. Problem solved.

Of course, for that you need to acknowledge that you violated the "ask, don't be an assumer" rule, instead of bossing customers around with "golden rules". You won't change their silly and pointless habits anyway.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 13 points 1 day ago

Here in Curitiba it's this church:

It's constantly maintained and renovated, but the building is 287 years old, built in 1737. (For reference the city itself is 331yo.)

It's kind of funny that people here don't typically remember the name of that church, Igreja da Ordem (Church of the Order; the "order" in question are the Franciscans). Instead they remember the name of the square that the church faces, named after the church - o Largo da Ordem (lit. "Order Plaza", but more like "the plaza of the church of the Order").

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 5 points 1 day ago

Siegfrieda also liked to sleep on sinks, although she grew out of the habit:

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 6 points 1 day ago

yes it’s raining on this side of the house too.

"You can never be sure!" - cat logic.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Perhaps she associated bathtub = attention and feeling good afterwards? Cats do show some sort of weak "past cause, present effect" connection.

In Kika's case I don't have an idea, as the place changes from time to time. It used to be on the stairs, then on the sisal mat, now the box. It's kind of annoying when I'm taking my morning yerba though, as I'm in the kitchen and she's meowing constantly.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 23 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Kika (16?yo): she likes to be petted, but she's wants to be petted in a very specific corner of the house - currently her cardboard box, but it changes over time. So she begs me "pet me, pet me!", then as I move my hand to pet her she runs to the box, and keeps meowing. Until I go pet her in the cardboard box.

Siegfrieda (7?yo): I don't know what's weirder: looking at the rain and meowing at me as if saying "can't you stop it?", watching anime with me, or the "overly attached girlfriend" face that she does when someone is eating yoghurt.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

As another user and me were discussing, in another thread about the same topic, I believe that the 10% admix is likely due to coastal settlements here in South America. Nothing too fancy, just to facilitate trade. Specially with the folks in Central Andes, as the Andeans had a good and large (albeit land-based) trade network already. And, well, when you run this sort of settlement you're bound to interact with locals, right?

 

Link to the community: !isekai@ani.social

Feel free to join and talk about your favourite series. The rules are rather simple, and they're there to ensure smooth discussion.

 

Links to the community:

The community is open for everyone regardless of previous knowledge on the field. Feel free to ask or share stuff about languages and dialects, how they work (grammar, phonology, etc.), where they're from, how people use them, or more general stuff about human linguistic communication.

And the rules are fairly simple. They boil down to 1) stay on-topic, 2) source it when reasonable, 3) avoid pseudoscience.

Have fun!

view more: next ›