m0darn

joined 1 year ago
[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

THPS 1+2 (the HD remake) is excellent but they decided not to do a THPS3+4 remake. Presumably due to low numbers. BUT online is broken. What I mean by broken is that you basically can't log in to the server if your console is connected to the internet through a router. As far as I know Activision never acknowledged that failure. Do you think this problem might have hurt sales/microtransaction revenue?

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not convinced that just cash will solve homelessness or poverty. It may help, but it seems like a "give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime" kinda situation. Give people the fish so they can eat, but if you want them to actually be independent, then you gotta make sure they have the tools they need to do so.

I think the reason you've taken so much flak is that money isn't fish. Money can be converted into tools. Yes, of course you're right that some people won't use the money in a way which will end their homelessness, and may benefit from 'other programs'. But the meme was specifically about people objecting to the idea of giving poor people money so that they can solve their own problems. Rolling out 'other programs' is great, but the 'other programs' will be much more effective if they're not clogged with people that can solve their own problems with a bit of cash.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

I agree that the government should govern not politick, but isn't it a bit naive to think you can make lasting change without politicking?

I wonder if it's useful to look at "governing", and "politicking" as either end of a spectrum with "leading" as the sweet spot.

Just my two cents though.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 months ago

It's because of the rail labour dispute. The NDP can't/won't be party to cutting down unions.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

It's really telling that Chinese EVs (like imported Teslas) were basically considered fine until the prospect of them being affordable to the middle class arose. That's when we started hearing about labour abuses and fires that only happen with * cheap Chinese* batteries.

It's not like Tesla has a stellar reputation for quality and reliability. They started powerwall as a way to offload bad/ prematurely failing batteries. Don't get me wrong, powerwall is a good idea. But pretending like BYD is going to have terrible batteries and that's why we need tariffs is bad.

China has labour and human rights abuses (eg genocide of Uyghers in Xinjiang [cultural genocide is still genocide]). Imo Canada is doing a better job of reconciling with its history/present of cultural genocide than China is. Canada's TFW program probably results in lots of horrible abuses that we don't hear about, but i think this program may be on its way out too. These issues don't only apply to EVs though.

The only things that're EV specific are lithium batteries and automotive manufacturing.

EV tariffs are protectionism: We want to protect domestic automotive (and para-automotive) manufacturing capabilities, and our investments in EVs/green tech.

I don't think 100% tariffs can be justified on EVs alone.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Mr. Poilievre, should Canada deem rail freight an essential service and nationalize the railways?"

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

That's exactly what seems to be happening

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

My understanding is that the union and the rail companies are pretty far apart in negotiations. The workers/ union were happy to keep working while negotiations progressed, but the rail companies didn't want to negotiate anymore and wanted to go to binding arbitration.

Rail companies locked out the workers.

Government says "you can't do that you have to go to binding arbitration".

Rail companies get an absolute win. It's so fucked.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 44 points 2 months ago (3 children)

If they know these people are active criminals they will have no problem citing just cause for arrest and search.

I live in Canada, our gun rules are different than the USA. This week in my city some charges against a dangerous criminal were dropped because the police had a "flagrant disregard for charter rights" (according to the judge) (oir charter rights are similar to American civil rights)

They searched him improperly, and found a loaded, illegal gun. Charges dismissed. If they had handled it properly they could have made the charges stick. What a waste of everyone's time. Police didn't respect his rights because they don't respect my rights.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The water in my community has poison added to it by my local government. It's a poison so heinous its usage is banned in war. It affects the clarity and taste of the water. No matter how many letters I write they are totally unwilling to stop chlorinating the water. It's outrageous!

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Isn't BYD the world's #1 or #2 battery company?

They ought to respect consumer protections and warranty laws but I don't think dismissal of their batteries outright makes sense.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

I would worry about it yeah. Also nobody buys a pint of haagen daas with the money they need to survive, and it will be obvious to them that it's been melted and refrozen.

view more: ‹ prev next ›