It was “not only a dismissal, but a dismissal with prejudice, meaning that my client can never be charged again for anything to do with this incident,” says Goetz.
This makes the good news even better.
It was “not only a dismissal, but a dismissal with prejudice, meaning that my client can never be charged again for anything to do with this incident,” says Goetz.
This makes the good news even better.
In my own experience, the internet is best for shocking, short-term nastiness. I’ve rarely met anyone in person who was quite as obnoxious or annoying as a particularly bad hit-and-run online troll.
IRL contact is still the “best” for deeply hurtful, damaging, long-term cruelty.
If you’re gonna sum up an entire culture in a handful of words, well, they could have done worse.
This can’t get off my feed fast enough
I think it’s a great rule!
To me, the links to alternate communities are essential. They allow you to set restrictions while still maintaining a helpful atmosphere. Sometimes, people have legitimate, good-faith questions, and don’t know where to ask them. Those links help demonstrate a real concern for the users. Well done!
Well, I just subbed! I think it’ll be good for my mental health.
So they can maintain plausible deniability.
Boo fucking hoo.
…most recently at a private screening of the film "Melania" documenting First Lady Melania Trump.
I am no fan of Cook, but hasn’t he suffered enough?
At least it’s a pop-up, and not something intended as a permanent business. If it does well enough, though…
Dude. That’s NOT a brag.
Abstract art. Whatever you want can “represent” whatever thought or feeling you say it does.
I’m not saying that the work of abstract artists isn’t creative. My point is that most people can’t tell the difference between a Jackson Pollock work and the results of giving a toddler unsupervised access to the paint cabinet.