mbirth

joined 1 year ago
[–] mbirth@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There’s dozens of us! Dozens! (Switched to Apple after 12 years of being an Android enthusiast.)

[–] mbirth@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

Put that mount point into the compose file(s). You can define volumes with type nfs and basically have Docker-Compose manage the mounts.

[–] mbirth@lemmy.ml 40 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

But when you report obvious fake accounts that merely exist for 5 days, follow 5000 people already and only have 3 followers themselves but a nice spammy link in their profile, they allegedly don’t violate any terms of services…

[–] mbirth@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That probably doesn’t work unless you power-cycle the picture frame after changing the photos.

I had this with some offline Samsung picture frame and a Transcend WiFi SD card. The SD card runs a small Linux and can be unlocked to add own scripts. I had a script that would rsync files from my storage to the SD. However, while the new files were written to the SD just fine, the picture frame never re-read the list of files from the SD. And after power-cycling, my specific model needed to be turned on manually again. So, that wasn’t a satisfactory solution.

[–] mbirth@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Following a profile logged-out is impossible now

What do you mean? I can just open an Incognito tab and go to x.com/ and see all posts (without replies, though).

because they don't run alts

I think you underestimate the dedication of some of those trolls. Also, most apps allow to easily switch between profiles with like 2 taps.

[–] mbirth@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m so glad I’ve spent my 2 or 3 bitcoins back in the early years for some 60€ software…

[–] mbirth@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Of course, not. But closing and locking the door doesn’t prevent the person on the other side to still listen in on your conversations…

[–] mbirth@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

And it’s exactly like this now, if I understand the change correctly. They only removed the “you can’t see this post because the owner limits who can see it” thing. Blocked people still can’t reply.

[–] mbirth@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Yep, that’s why I don’t get all this panicking about the Twitter change…

[–] mbirth@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

In closed systems like messengers, where you don’t see any content unless logged in, yes. There, it works brilliantly. But on Twitter, this is like cutting out something from a newspaper when there’s a news stand right next door.

[–] mbirth@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 weeks ago (13 children)

Having a public (i.e. not locked) Twit𝕏 account and believing you can block single people is a bit stupid to begin with.

When screaming on a market square, you can’t demand for single people to “please not listen” to what you’re screaming.

[–] mbirth@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 weeks ago (21 children)

Rather people have no idea how blocking on 𝕏 worked/works. You were ALWAYS able to see tweets from people that blocked you by simply logging out or using an alt account.

I don’t understand all this fuss about this simple change. He only removes a useless feature that was never more than a minor inconvenience for those that got blocked.

If you don’t want people to see your tweets, lock your profile. This worked before and this still works just fine.

view more: ‹ prev next ›