mdalin

joined 2 years ago
[–] mdalin@infosec.pub 5 points 6 hours ago

The live action Chip N' Dale Rescue Rangers remake on Disney+ is SOOOOOO much better than it has any right to be.

It should be terrible, unwatchable, irredeemable garbage.

It is probably one of the best "kids" movies I've seen in the last decade.

[–] mdalin@infosec.pub 3 points 2 weeks ago

Ugh.... Monogamists...

[–] mdalin@infosec.pub 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I agree with everything you said. You CAN draw a logical line from what Trump's lawyers are saying to the conclusion that "Trump lawyers tell Supreme Court that Constitution doesn’t apply to the president." That statement and conclusion is not, technically, factually, incorrect.

However, I do feel like using that statement as a headline strips away all the context and nuance, leaving nothing behind but rage-inductive click-bait. That headline gives no meaningful information, and if someone takes it as literal truth, without reading the rest of the story, they will be massively uninformed about what's actually going on. It's a disservice to the reader.

[–] mdalin@infosec.pub 18 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm just as frustrated and horrified by what's going on as everyone else, but this headline is SUCH a stretch. Like, 98% click bait, 2% kinda-sorta truth. PLEASE read the actual article and not just the headline.

This story is about a specific legal mechanism (universal injunction) that has been used by federal judges in dozens of cases throughout decades. It's a controversial mechanism that has been used on both sides of the political spectrum. Sometimes for better, sometimes for worse. It's currently being used to pause some of Trump's worst bullshit.

Trump's lawyers are arguing that this very specific mechanism shouldn't be permitted in current cases regarding immigration. They've also argued that this particular mechanism is unconstitutional. His lawyers are wrong, and shitty, but they are in no way arguing that "the constitution doesn't apply to the president."

[–] mdalin@infosec.pub 46 points 5 months ago

Important to note the "done and dusted" quote in the headline of this article (and most of the rest of the "content") isn't from anyone at any government agency. It comes from a guy who runs a "data encryption start-up" and is shilling his own product. Most of the "news" being covered here is just speculation from this one guy.

The only "reversed course" from the government, as alluded to in the article, is CISA encouraging government employees to use E2EE messaging since our telecom infrastructure is basically perma-pwn'd by the Chinese.

Government intelligence agencies would still VERY MUCH like to have backdoors in this encryption and there is nothing to indicate that has changed.